LAURA, YOU CAN HELP HER WITH THAT. WITH THAT KITCHEN. START FROM ONE SIDE OR THE OTHER.
[Work Session meeting on November 3, 2025.]
[00:00:06]
OKAY. SUPERVISOR RICHARDSON, PRESENT. COUNCILMAN HERE. COUNCILMAN NOWAKOWSKI HERE.COUNCILWOMAN TO PRESENT. AND COUNCILWOMAN FARRELL PRESENT. OKAY. ALRIGHT. WE'LL DO THE WHICH LOOKS LIKE. ABSOLUTELY. THAT'S OUR MEETING AT THIS. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. ALL RIGHT. WORK SESSION. EXECUTIVE SESSION.
JOSH IS ACTUALLY GOING. NEXT ITEM ON A WORK SESSION. AGENDA IS FOR JOSH TO REVIEW THE LAKEVIEW COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AFTER THAT.
OKAY. THANK YOU, JOSH. FLOOR IS THE FLOOR IS YOURS. JUST MAKE SURE THAT MICROPHONES ARE OKAY.
GOOD. ALL RIGHT. FOR TODAY'S WORK SESSION, KIND OF LIKE TOWN ATTORNEY FARRELL SAID. WE, IF YOU GUYS RECALL, HAVE BEEN GOING BACK AND FORTH ABOUT THE LAKEVIEW COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, WHICH I'LL ACTUALLY TOUCH A LITTLE BIT MORE WHEN WE GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. BUT I ALSO WANTED TO DO IS THERE'S A NUMBER OF RESOLUTIONS THAT ARE ON THE TOWN BOARD AGENDA TONIGHT, SOME THAT ARE SIMPLY REFERRING ZONING CODE UPDATES TO THE PLANNING BOARD, SOME THAT ARE RESOLUTIONS AND ADOPTION RESOLUTIONS. AND I JUST WANTED TO GO OVER THOSE DOCUMENTS SO THAT EVERYONE ON THIS BOARD IS AWARE OF WHAT'S ON THE DOCKET. LIKE I SAID, SOME ARE FOR APPROVAL, SOME ARE FOR JUST TAKING THE NEXT STEP BEFORE A PUBLIC HEARING. WHAT YOU ALL HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU AT YOUR DESK. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S ON THE TOWN BOARD AGENDA TONIGHT ARE, IF YOU RECALL FROM THE LAST MEETING, I TALKED ABOUT GETTING STARTED ON SOME OF THE REZONINGS OUT OF THE TOWN'S LOCAL WATERFRONT PLAN. WE HAD SOME CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WHO TOLD US THAT WE COULD GO FORWARD WITH SOME OF THOSE REZONINGS WHILE THE LW IS IN THEIR QUEUE OF THEIR REVIEWING IT. SO WHAT YOU'LL SEE IN FRONT OF YOU IS A MAP OF ALL OF THE AREAS THAT WE HAD MENTIONED FROM THE PROPOSED TO BE REZONED.
I DID HAVE SOME CORRESPONDENCE WITH COUNCIL MEMBER KOZUB ABOUT A QUESTION ABOUT SOME PROPERTY OVER BY THE FORMER WOODLAWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND THERE WAS A QUESTION ON WHETHER OR NOT THAT WAS PROPOSED TO BE REZONED. AND I CONFIRMED THAT IT IS NOT IT'S GOING TO STAY ITS CURRENT ZONING, THE LAND THAT IS AROUND IT IS ACTUALLY OWNED BY THE TOWN OF HAMBURG, AND THAT IS WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE REZONED TO PR, BECAUSE AS YOU CAN SEE ON THAT MAP, IT'S EXISTING BALL FIELDS AND GREEN SPACE. ANYWAYS, THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY CALLED ME UP, SO I JUST INFORMED THEM THAT I SAYS, BUT LET ME DOUBLE CHECK. I SAYS, I'VE BEEN KNOWN TO BE WRONG. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN ASK MARIA IF SHE'S HERE. AND SO THAT'S ONE OF THEM. ONE OF THE IF YOU LOOK AT ALL THE OTHER PROPERTIES, ONE OF THE PROPERTIES OVER BY WHAT WAS THE FORMER HAMBURG SKATE PARK THAT ALSO HAD A FORMER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. I KNOW THERE'S BEEN A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT PROPERTY. WHO OWNS IT, WHAT IT'S ZONE. I KNOW THERE'S BEEN THINGS CIRCULATING ABOUT IT. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED R2, MEANING THAT THE ONLY THING THAT COULD BE BUILT ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY WOULD BE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME OR A DUPLEX.
WE ARE CURRENTLY PROPOSING TO REZONE IT TO THAT PR DISTRICT, WHICH WOULD MEAN ONLY A PUBLIC PARK, A PRIVATE PARK, RECREATIONAL USES. SO SOMETHING LIKE A SKATE PARK COULD GO BACK ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY, BUT THOSE WOULD BE THE ONLY USES. IT WOULDN'T BE FOR ANY TYPE OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, ANY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SO I THINK THAT SHOULD HELP CALM SOME OF THE CONCERNS ABOUT THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY. THAT IS. PROPOSED REZONING MAP NUMBER TWO FOR THIS BOARD. I'LL GIVE IT TO YOU. THAT ENTIRE PARCEL, WHICH WAS THE FORMER SKATE PARK, IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE REZONED TO PR PROPOSED REZONING MAP NUMBER THREE. IF YOU LOOK, THIS IS OVER BY OLD CAMP ROAD, CAMP ROAD IN SAINT FRANCIS DRIVE NEAR SAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL.
WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED TO BE REZONED? ARE THERE ARE SOME CURRENT PROPERTIES THAT ARE C 3C3 IS THE OFFICE DISTRICT. WHAT'S ALLOWED IN C-3 IS LITERALLY OFFICES. AND THERE ARE SOME SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND SOME EXISTING BUSINESSES THAT ARE WITHIN THAT AREA THAT ARE CURRENTLY NON-CONFORMING. IF YOU LOOK AT THE MAP, WHAT'S IN YELLOW IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE REZONED TO R-1. SO THERE'S SOME SINGLE FAMILY HOMES RIGHT NOW, LIKE I SAID, THAT ARE ZONED C-3. BY REZONING THOSE TO R-1, THEY WOULD BE CONFORMING. IF ANYONE EVER WANTED TO SELL THEIR HOME. IT HAS THE PROPER ZONING DISTRICT. I DON'T ANTICIPATE. HOPEFULLY THERE SHOULDN'T BE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT REZONING, BUT WE'VE SCHEDULED A PUBLIC HEARING FOR DECEMBER 8TH. PEOPLE WILL GET NOTICES. IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, THEY'LL FEEL FREE TO COME TO THAT PUBLIC HEARING. AND THEN IF YOU LOOK AT THAT MAP, WHAT HAS THE GREEN
[00:05:03]
HATCHING IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE REZONED TO A NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL? THE REASON FOR THAT IS ONE OF THOSE BUSINESSES ON THE WEST HALF OF CAMP ROAD, NEXT TO BEECH AVENUE, IS SELLERS INSURANCE. THAT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED C-3 AND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT. BY REZONING IT TO THAT, THEIR USE WOULD CONTINUE TO BE ALLOWED, BUT IF THEY HAD ANY OTHER COMMERCIAL USES, IF IT WAS EVER SOLD, THEY STILL CAN KEEP THAT LOW LEVEL, LOW INTENSITY COMMERCIAL USE VERSUS IF THEY SOLD IT AND IT'S C-3, THEY COULD ONLY DO AN OFFICE BUILDING. AND THEN ALSO ONE OF THE REASONS WHY ONE OF THOSE OTHER PROPERTIES ON THE EASTERN HALF OF SAINT FRANCIS DRIVE IS BEING PROPOSED TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL IS BECAUSE IT'S A HOME, BUT THERE'S A WINDSURFING BUSINESS THAT'S OPERATING OUT OF THE HOME BY REZONING IT TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, THEIR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE IS ALLOWED, AND THEIR HOME OCCUPATION OUT OF THAT HOUSE IS ALSO ALLOWED. AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL VERSUS IN C-3. IT'S CURRENTLY NOT ALLOWED. SO THOSE ARE ALL OF THE ZONING PROPOSED CHANGES ON MAP NUMBER THREE AND THEN ON MAP NUMBER FOUR THIS IS HAMPTON BROOK WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA.THIS IS ACTUALLY A D.C. STATE OWNED PIECE OF PROPERTY. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, MEANING THAT TECHNICALLY THE STATE COULD PUT HOMES ON THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY.
OBVIOUSLY IT'S A WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA AND IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THAT WAY. BUT BY REZONING IT TO PR, WE KILL ANY CHANCES OF THAT EVER BEING SOLD OR EVER BEING TURNED OVER TO A PRIVATE DEVELOPER OR WHATEVER COULD HAPPEN TO IT BY REZONING IT TO PR, IT STAYS WHAT IT IS, WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREA. AND THAT'S REALLY JUST SOME CLEANUP BECAUSE WE NOTICED ALMOST EVERY OTHER PARK, 18 MILE CREEK COUNTY PARK, TAYLOR ROAD PARK, ALL OF OUR PARKS ARE ZONED PR, AND THIS WAS ONE OF THE ONLY AREAS THAT'S NOT TOWN OWNED OR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT OWNED THAT WAS ZONED INCORRECTLY. SO ONCE AGAIN, THAT NUMBER FOUR WOULD BE REZONED FROM R-AR RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL TO PR PARKS AND RECREATION. SO THOSE ARE ALL THE REZONINGS FROM THE WATERFRONT PLAN. LIKE I SAID, WE GOT SIGNED OFF FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE SAYING THAT WE COULD PROCEED WITH THAT EVEN THOUGH THE PLAN IS STILL UNDER REVIEW FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. BUT I THINK IF WE CAN GET THIS DONE BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR, THAT'D BE REALLY GOOD TO GET THAT OFF OF OUR DOCKET AND WE CAN MOVE ON TO OTHER THINGS. LIKE I SAID, THERE'LL BE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ALL OF THESE ON DECEMBER 8TH. I OBVIOUSLY WILL BE ON HAND TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS. THERE AREN'T TOO MANY PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THESE REZONINGS, ONLY THE ONES OVER BY CAMP ROAD. BUT LIKE I SAID, WHAT WE'D BE DOING IS MAKING THEIR ZONING CONFORMING, WHICH WILL ACTUALLY BE A GOOD THING FOR THEM. SO WE'LL EXPLAIN THAT, ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND WE'LL GO FROM THERE. ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY OF THE REZONINGS FROM THE WATERFRONT PLAN? SO. JUST LOOKING AT THIS WITH THE RIVER ROAD, AND YOU SAID THE OLD SKATE PARK IS. THERE'S AN OLD TREATMENT PLANT THERE, RIGHT.
IT'S LIKE VACANT LAND RIGHT NOW. IT'S LIKE, YEAH, IT'S A THERE'S REMNANTS OF THE FORMER TREATMENT PLANT AND THEN THERE'S STILL SOME EXISTING SKATE PARK MATERIALS THAT ARE ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY. YEAH, YEAH. SO BY LIKE I SAID, REZONING IT TO PR WOULD STILL IF THE TOWN EVER WANTED TO REVAMP THAT AS ANOTHER SKATE PARK OR PUT ANY RECREATIONAL USES THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO. BUT I KNOW THERE'S BEEN QUESTIONS OF WHAT IT'S ZONED RIGHT NOW, WHAT IT'S ZONED FOR, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS ZONED R-2, MEANING YOU COULD PUT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THAT PROPERTY. YOU COULD PUT DUPLEXES ON THAT PROPERTY THE TOWN DOES. SO WHO'S GOING TO I MEAN, IF THE TOWN EVER WANTED TO SELL IT TO A PRIVATE DEVELOPER, THE TOWN. RIGHT? YEAH. BUY IT AND PUT DOUBLE DUPLEX ON IT. RIGHT. SO IF THE TOWN EVER WANTS TO SELL IT OFF TO A DEVELOPER OR DEVELOP IT ITSELF, THEN THEY COULD. BUT BY REZONING IT TO PR, WE'RE LIMITING THE USE OF SEWER DISTRICT OR SOMETHING AT ONE POINT, MAYBE I MEAN, I, I, I, I THINK I REMEMBER SEEING. YEAH. BUT YEAH. SO THAT'S, THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF IT. I KNOW THERE'S BEEN SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT WHO OWNS THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY AND WHAT COULD BE DONE WITH IT, BUT I THINK TO THE NORTH OF THAT DOESN'T LIKE PALADINO ON THAT.
CAN I SEE THE MAP? CAN, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THERE'S THE BAYVIEW RIGHT THERE. YES. YES.
ELLICOTT. ELLICOTT DEVELOPMENT DOES OWN. YEAH. ELLICOTT. THEY OWN TO THE NORTH OF IT. THEY ALSO OWN THAT PARCEL TO THE EAST OF IT THAT HAS THE PART THAT'S NORTH OF WHAT THAT RACETRACK IS. THEY ALSO OWN THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY AS WELL. YEP, YEP. SO THEY OWN THAT AND THEN THEY OWN OBVIOUSLY THE COWBOY AND THE PROPERTY WEST OF THE COWBOY. RIGHT. YEP. BUT SO BY ZONING THIS IT IT GOES TO WHAT WERE THE USES JUST FOR THEN FOR IF WE REZONE THE FORMER SKATE PARK. YEAH IT WOULD BE PUBLIC PARKS, PRIVATE PARKS, RECREATIONAL USES, GARDENS, PARKS. THE NAME OF THE DISTRICT IS PARK AND RECREATION. SO THOSE KIND OF USES NO COMMERCIAL OR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT OKAY. YEP. ALL RIGHT. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT. ARE WE VOTING ON THAT TODAY. WHAT YOU WOULD BE VOTING FOR IS SENDING THESE REZONINGS
[00:10:01]
TO ALL THE DIFFERENT STATE AGENCIES WHO NEED TO HAVE COMMENT ON IT. AND YOU'D BE SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR DECEMBER 8TH. OKAY. WHAT IS IT THAT WE'RE ACTUALLY VOTING ON TODAY? SO WHAT YOU'RE VOTING ON TODAY IS TO REZONE PROPERTY AT JEFFREY BOULEVARD THAT'S CURRENTLY SPLIT ZONED, MEANING THAT THERE'S A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS TO M2 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. OKAY. AND THEN WHAT YOU'RE ALSO WOULD BE VOTING ON TODAY ARE THAT IT SHOULD BE IN YOUR BIG PACKET OF STUFF THAT HAS THE ATTACHMENTS. OKAY. YEAH. SO YOU'LL SEE IT TO THAT EARLIER WHEN YOU WERE TALKING. YEAH ABOUT THE HOOVER ROAD. AND THAT'S WHY THOSE OKAY.NOW YOU'RE GOOD I WAS LOOKING AT THE BECAUSE THERE'S THERE'S SEVERAL THERE'S SEVERAL. YEAH.
YEP. LOOKED AT THAT OVER THE WEEKEND. YEAH. SO IN THAT HUGE PACKET OF I KNOW THERE'S LIKE 100 THINGS THAT ARE IN THERE. A LOT OF THEM ARE JUST ATTACHMENTS. BUT WHAT'S IN THERE ARE THE MAPS FOR THAT AREA THAT'S BEING INDUSTRIAL ZONED. AND THEN CODE AMENDMENTS, INCLUDING THINGS ON HIGHER PROVISIONS FOR CAR WASHES, HIGHER PROVISIONS FOR PRIVATE RENTAL, MINI STORAGE, REMOVING APARTMENTS FROM BEING ALLOWED IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER CODE AMENDMENTS WHICH I CAN TOUCH ON BEFORE THE HIGHER PROVISIONS.
YOU MEAN ACTUALLY MORE RESTRICTIVE, CORRECT? YEAH. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, CAR WASHES, THE AMOUNT BETWEEN ONE ANOTHER IS BEING INCREASED. THE AMOUNT THAT THEY ARE NEXT TO A RESIDENTIAL AREA ARE BEING INCREASED. RIGHT NOW THEY'RE 500FT. WE'RE PROPOSING TO HAVE THAT BUFFER BE 1000FT THINGS LIKE THAT. HOW DOES THAT IMPACT THE EXISTING CAR WASHES? HOW WE HAVE IT WRITTEN IS THAT IF YOUR CAR WASH IS ALREADY EXISTING AT THE TIME OF LOCAL ADOPTION, YOU'RE ABLE TO CONTINUE, BUT NO NEW CAR WASHES WILL BE ABLE TO ALLOW IT TO BE FRONTING ON SOUTH PARK. MCKINLEY ROUTE FIVE SOUTHWESTERN. WHAT'S WITH THIS PUBLIC OBSESSION WITH CLEANLINESS IN THEIR VEHICLES? IT'S GET A TAN ONE LIKE ME OR. YEAH, WE ALSO WE ALSO DID A MAP THAT SHOWS ALL THE CAR WASHES IN TOWN. AND THERE YOU CAN SEE THEY'RE LITTERED ALL OVER SOUTHWESTERN SOUTH PARK. SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS EXISTING ONES, THEY'RE ABLE TO STAY, BUT NEW ONES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO FRONT ONTO THOSE ROADS, AND THEY'LL HAVE HIGHER RESIDENTIAL BUFFERS AND THEY'LL HAVE HIGHER BUFFERS NEXT TO EXISTING CAR WASHES BECAUSE THEY'RE BECAUSE OF BECAUSE OF MECHANIZATION AND A, A BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE, YOU DON'T NEED I MEAN, THESE ARE THINGS THAT ARE MECHANIZED AND YOU DON'T NEED A LOT OF PEOPLE TO. TO OPERATE ONE, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO LOAD THE SOAP ONE PERSON, YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? SO LIKE IF YOU GET A BUSINESS, YOU'RE PROBABLY YOU'RE IF YOU'RE RUNNING A RESTAURANT, YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU NEED A WHOLE BUNCH OF WORKERS, RIGHT? BUT ANYWAY, I JUST LIKE IT JUST SEEMS LIKE ALL OF A SUDDEN. YEAH. LIKE EVERYWHERE. JUST LIKE CAR WASHES, RIGHT? ALTHOUGH I LIKE THE PLANNING BOARD LEVEL, I CAN SAY WE HAVEN'T HAD A CAR WASH APPLICATION IN TWO YEARS BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN LOOKING INTO THIS ISSUE AND WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY. I KNOW THERE WAS ONE THAT WAS PROPOSED. I THINK OVERALL MCKINLEY PARKWAY, BUT WE HAVEN'T HAD AT LEAST AT THE PLANNING BOARD LEVEL. WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY APPLICATIONS IN TWO YEARS. SO AT LEAST ON THAT END IT'S BEEN SLOWING UP. BUT WE'RE TRYING TO TAKE THE PROPER PROVISIONS IN CASE THEY EVER COME BACK, THAT THERE'S. YEAH, THE CAR WASH. RIGHT. SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO YEAH. SO THOSE ARE, THOSE ARE SOME OF THE, THE THINGS THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT. OF COURSE WHEN WE GET INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION OR AFTERWARDS, IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE ANY OF THE THE RESOLUTIONS, FEEL FREE TO HAVE ME EXPLAIN TO ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC WHO WANTS TO KNOW, AND I'LL FEEL FREE TO DO SO. ARE YOU GOING TO DO ANOTHER PRESENTATION LIKE YOU DID PREVIOUSLY, LIKE OUT IN FRONT OR DOWNSTAIRS OR WHATNOT BEFORE THE MEETINGS? YEAH. OKAY. YEP. BECAUSE I THOUGHT THAT WAS KIND OF GOOD THOUGH. SOME OF THE PEOPLE ASKED THE SAME QUESTIONS IN HERE THAT THEY DID OUT THERE. RIGHT. EXACTLY AS JOSH HAS DONE A NUMBER OF THOSE NOW, AND THEY'VE PROVEN TO BE VERY SUCCESSFUL. AND IT'S A GREAT TOOL FOR US TO GET INFORMATION OUT TO THE PUBLIC AND ALSO FOR THEM TO COME AND ASK ONE ON ONE WITH JOSH QUESTIONS AND HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING. AND THE INTENTION IS TO ANY TIME GOING FORWARD WHERE WE'RE HAVING A PUBLIC HEARING OR WE'RE MAKING A CHANGE THAT THAT JOSH WOULD BE AVAILABLE, JUST THAT TO INCREASE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND GIVE THEM THAT OPPORTUNITY, BOTH FOR INPUT AND FOR CLARIFICATION. RIGHT. AS THEY WOULD SAY IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY, FOR AN OFFICER, JOSH IS TECHNICALLY A TECHNICALLY PROFICIENT, I APPRECIATE THAT, YEAH. YOU'RE WELCOME. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE WE GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION OR IS THERE ANOTHER WORK SESSION PERSON AFTER ME? NO, NO. OKAY. WELL, I'LL SEE YOU THE ONLY STAR OF THE DAY AGAIN. I'LL SEE YOU SOON THEN. OKAY. HOW'S THE MOTION TO ADJOURN THE WORK SESSION FOR WHAT'S GOING TO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR WHAT? FOR WHAT? WE HAVE TO NOTE WHAT I WHAT TOPIC? IT'S FOR. PENDING LAWSUIT. PENDING LITIGATION. PENDING LITIGATION. YEAH. MR. MISKOVSKY, WHO'S BEEN HERE BEFORE THIS. NOW, ISN'T THAT PART OF THE. IS THAT THE ONLY ITEM, KEN LAKEFIELD ITEM I HAVE? NO. CAN WE DO ANYTHING WITH THAT? WHILE THAT PENDING LITIGATION, NONE OF THE TWO LITIGATION LITIGATION MATTERS. TWO
[00:15:05]
LITIGATION MATTERS. KATHY MADE THE MOTION.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.