[00:00:29]
          ONE NATION, UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. MEMBER, COULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? KATELYN SHIMURA PRESENT. RICHARD SAJAK HERE. WILLIAM CLARK HERE. BRIAN STEWART HERE. KIM FINDLAY HERE. MILTON KWANT HERE. JOSEPH GOGUEN. OKAY, WITH 
          [1. Public Hearing – 7:00 P.M., Jonathan Johnsen – Requesting Preliminary Plat Approval  on a proposal for a 2-lot subdivision to be located at 2342 Pleasant Ave (SBL #:  181.00-1-5.11)]
THAT, WE WILL BEGIN OUR FIRST ITEM. WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE JONATHAN JOHNSON PROJECT, REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL ON A PROPOSAL FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE LOCATED AT 2342 PLEASANT AVENUE. JOSH, IS THERE ANYTHING WE'D LIKE TO ADD BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? THE ONLY THING THAT I'LL REMIND THE PLANNING BOARD IS THIS IS A UNIQUE KIND OF SUBDIVISION WHERE THE LOT THAT WILL BE SPLIT IS ACTUALLY ACROSS FROM RAILROAD TRACKS AND IS ACTUALLY A DIFFERENT ZONING. WE WENT ABOUT IT LAST TIME. OBVIOUSLY, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THE OPERATING ENGINEERS, AND WHAT'S ON THE SCREEN IS HIGHLIGHTED IN THE RED IS THE LOT THAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO SPLIT. ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS. 
          THERE WILL BE ACCESS TO IT FROM HARBOR RUN LANE, AND AT MOST THE DEVELOPMENT COULD BE FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. SO NO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, ANYTHING OF THAT SORT. AND ALSO, JUST TO CLARIFY THAT THERE'S NO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THIS IN FRONT OF US AT THIS TIME. 
          CORRECT LOT. THANKS. OKAY. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES. JONATHAN JOHNSON, I'M THE ATTORNEY FOR THE OPERATING ENGINEERS TRAINING FUND, WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY. THEY OWN ABOUT 420 ACRES IN THE AREA. AND THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO SPLIT OFF THIS, THIS SMALL PIECE SO THAT THEY COULD SELL IT BECAUSE IT'S ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS. AND IN HERE AGAIN, CAN'T HEAR ANYTHING. OH. OH, IT'S WE CAN'T HEAR WHAT HE'S SAYING. SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE. I THOUGHT I. SORRY ABOUT THAT. SO MY NAME IS JONATHAN JOHNSON. I'M THE ATTORNEY FOR THE OPERATING ENGINEERS TRAINING FUND, WHICH OWNS THIS PIECE OF LAND, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 400 AND SOMETHING ACRES PART OF THE IT IS THIS 14 ACRE PLOT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO SPLIT OFF IS ONE THAT LIES ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS FROM THE PROPERTY WE ACTUALLY USE. THERE'S NO ACCESS FROM OUR SIDE EXCEPT THROUGH A LITTLE TUNNEL, EXCEPT ACROSS THE TRACKS OR THROUGH A LITTLE TUNNEL THAT THE RAILROAD PUT IN. SO AGAIN, WE DON'T USE IT. WE WANT TO SPLIT IT OFF AND SELL IT TO SOMEONE TO, TO USE IT AS THEY, YOU KNOW, CAN UNDER. 
          THEY'D HAVE TO COME BACK HERE. BUT OUR INTENT IS JUST TO SPLIT IT AND SELL IT. OKAY. WITH THAT, AUGIE, COULD YOU PLEASE READ THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE? LEGAL NOTICE. TOWN. TOWN OF HAMBURG. PLANNING BOARD. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD WILL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE LOCATED AT 2342 PLEASANT AVENUE, SB L, NUMBER 181.00-1-5.11. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 17TH, 2026 AT 7 P.M. IN ROOM SEVEN, A AND B OF THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD. OKAY. AS A FRIENDLY REMINDER, A PUBLIC HEARING IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COMMUNITY TO SHARE INFORMATION ON HOW THEY ARE IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT. A THREE MINUTE RULE WILL APPLY. IT IS NOT A QUESTION AND ANSWER PERIOD. ALL STATEMENTS MADE DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, AS WELL AS WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE PROJECT, WILL BE SENT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING BOARD, AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT. OKAY, SO IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD WISH TO MAKE A PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE. I REALIZE WE'RE CALLING THIS THE JONATHAN JENSEN PROJECT, BUT THAT'S THE ATTORNEY. SO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE OPERATORS ENGINEERS SUBDIVISION. SURE. IF YOU WOULD COME UP TO THE PODIUM HERE AND ALSO IF YOU COULD THEN SAY AND SPELL YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. SO DISORGANIZED. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THIS PROPERTY IS THAT YOU WANT TO. I'M SORRY. REAL QUICK. MY NAME IS BOB PIFKO PIPIKO FIRST NAME ROBERT. I LIVE UP 
          [00:05:05]
THE ROAD ABOUT A QUARTER MILE TOWARD 20. I SEE THE RED DOT FROM GOOGLE, BUT THAT LOOKS LIKE IT'S RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE OPERATING ENGINEER TRAINING CENTER. IS THAT GOING TO BE THE PART THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, THAT YOU'RE GOING TO TURN INTO R1 AND BUILD HOUSING IN THERE? NO, NO, NO NO NO. WHERE, WHERE, WHERE'S THIS? WHERE, WHERE'S THIS TWO LOT SUBDIVISION GOING TO BE PEELED OFF OF THAT PROPERTY. SO JUST A REMINDER, THIS IS NOT A QUESTION AND ANSWER, BUT I WILL PROVIDE CLARIFYING INFORMATION. THE ACTUAL PIECE OF PROPERTY IS ACROSS THE STREET ACROSS THE RAILROAD TRACKS WHERE YOU SEE THE HARBOR RUN LANE OVER HERE, ROAD END WITH LITTLE ARROWS RUNNING WITH LITTLE ARROWS. YES, THAT'S ON, THAT'S ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TRACKS. CORRECT. WHICH IS WHY THEY SEE NO POINT IN HOLDING IT BY THE OPERATING ENGINEERS, WHICH WAS THE ONE IN QUESTION? NO. I SEE IT'S ALL OWNED BY ONE PROPERTY, ONE OWNER. OKAY. BECAUSE I KNOW THE I KNOW THE MAIN OFFICES FOR THE OPERATING ENGINEERS IS NEAR THAT QUARRY. RIGHT. SO THIS IS ALMOST ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE QUARRY. CORRECT. I SEE, OKAY, I DON'T HAVE ANY, ANY, ANY OBJECTION TO THAT. I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANYTHING TO DO WITH SEWERS OR WATERS THAT'S GOING TO AFFECT WHAT WE'RE ABOUT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. 
          OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE THAT WOULD WISH TO SPEAK AND PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT? GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS STEVE MCCABE. I'M A PROPERTY OWNER AT 2285 PLEASANT AVENUE. LAST NAME IS SPELLED CAPITAL M, C, CAPITAL C, A B E. I'M CURIOUS ABOUT THE TOTAL ACREAGE FOR EACH OF THE PARCELS. MR. JOHNSON HAD MENTIONED 14 ACRES FOR ONE OF THE LOTS. WHAT IS THE REMAINING ACREAGE FOR THE OTHER LOT? WHAT IS THE ZONING FOR? I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A DIFFERENCE IN THE ZONING. WHAT IS THE ZONING FOR EACH OF THE LOTS AND. HOW ARE WE DEALING WITH THE POSSIBILITY OF A SEGMENTED REVIEW? SO AGAIN, THIS ISN'T A I UNDERSTAND IT. 
          THOSE ARE MY MY QUESTIONS MY COMMENTS. I'LL LEAVE THEM AT THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO OF THE LOTS IT IS 14 ACRES THAT'S BEING SUBDIVIDED THERE OF 409 ACRES THAT ARE OWNED BY THE OPERATING ENGINEERS. AT THIS POINT, THERE IS NO PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT MAY OR MAY NOT OCCUR ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY. THE ACTION RIGHT NOW IS SOLELY TO PROVIDE A NEW LINE IN THE SAND AND A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR A NEW OWNER. 
          AND HOW ARE THEY ZONED? I BELIEVE IT'S STILL I'M GONNA PULL UP ON THE MAP BECAUSE I THINK IT'LL MAKE IT EASIER. OKAY, SO ON THE SCREEN, THE THIS LARGER TRIANGULAR PIECE IS THE 400 PLUS ACRE PARCEL THAT THE OPERATING ENGINEERS OWNS. AND THEN ON THE OTHER SIDE, THIS IS ALL SBL ONE SBL NUMBER. SO ONE TAX PARCEL. SO YOU'LL SEE THIS LITTLE TRAPEZOIDAL PIECE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE RAILROAD. TECHNICALLY IN THE EYES OF THE TOWN OF HAMBURG IS ALL ONE CONTIGUOUS PIECE. WHAT THE OPERATING ENGINEERS IS LOOKING TO DO IS SPLIT OFF THIS TRAPEZOIDAL PIECE, WHICH IS ABOUT 14 ACRES. THE CURRENT ZONING OF IT IS R-1, WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, MEANING THAT THE TYPES OF USES THAT WOULD BE ALLOWED SHOULD THAT LOT BE SPLIT AND SOLD, WOULD BE A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE OR OTHER TYPES OF HOUSING LIKE THAT. THERE WOULD BE NO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED ON THAT PARCEL THAT WOULD BE SPLIT OFF. AND THEN, AS MEMBERS MENTIONED, THE OTHER ACREAGE THAT WON'T BE SPLIT OFF WILL BE ABOUT 400 PLUS ACRES. THAT IS ALSO R-1 THAT IS ON RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL RA. THANK YOU. YEP. 
          ANYONE ELSE HERE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT? GOING ONCE. SECOND CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. 
          AND THIRD CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. JOSH, WHAT IS OUR NEXT STEP? SO AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING ON JUNE 3RD OR ACTUALLY BACK IN MAY 20TH, THIS BOARD DID AUTHORIZE THAT I COULD DRAFT APPROVAL RESOLUTIONS. EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE A HARD COPY IN FRONT OF THEM. I WILL ALSO BRING IT UP ON THE SCREEN IN TERMS OF CONDITIONS FOR THE RESOLUTION. OBVIOUSLY IT'S AT THE END OF HARBOR RUN LANE, SO AT LEAST AS 
          [00:10:06]
OF RIGHT NOW, WE ALSO DON'T KNOW WHAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT. SO WE WOULD SAY THAT THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS WOULD NOT BE WARRANTED. AND THEN AS ALWAYS, IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER CONDITIONS THAT THIS BOARD DOES WANT TO CONSIDER, NOW WOULD BE THE TIME TO KIND OF RUN THROUGH THEM. OPEN IT UP TO BOARD MEMBERS IF THERE'S ANY. ANYBODY HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION? NO, NO NO NO NO. OKAY. OKAY. OH, YEAH. JOHN JOHNSON, OPERATING ENGINEERS. YES. WHAT IS IT? OPERATING ENGINEERS. YEAH. HE'S NOT THE OWNER. YES. IT'S THE OPERATING ENGINEERS. TRAINING FUND, WHICH IS SEPARATE FROM THE OPERATING ENGINEERS. PRETTY. 
          TRAINING TRAINING FUND FUND. YES. OKAY. YES. THERE WE GO. OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION. OKAY. WELL. LET'S SEE. LET'S GO. OKAY. I MAKE A MOTION OPERATING ENGINEERING TRAINING FUND TWO LOT SUBDIVISION 2342 PLEASANT AVE, SBL181.00-1-5- OR .11. 
          NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVAL RESOLUTION. SEQRA. AND ACCORDING WITH NEW YORK STATE LAW, THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HAS REVIEWED THE TWO LOT SUBDIVISION PROPOSED BY OPERATING ENGINEER TRAINING FUND TO BE LOCATED ON A PARCEL AT 2342 PLEASANT AVE, SBL, NUMBER 181.00-1-5.11. BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED MATERIALS AND INPUT FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS, THE PLANNING BOARD HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND THAT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS HEREBY ISSUED. THE PLANNING BOARD CHAIR IS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE EAF, WHICH WILL ACT AS A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. THERE'S A MOTION TO APPROVE A SECOND. SECOND, THE MOTION SECOND BY MEMBER DREES. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE AYE. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HEREBY GRANTS PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS TRAINING FUND 2342 PLEASANT AVE, TWO LOT SUBDIVISION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND WAIVERS. ONE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS IS NOT WARRANTED. FINALLY, THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD WAIVES THE COMPLETION OF THE FINAL PLAT, AND HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD CHAIR IS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. ONCE THE TOWN ENGINEER SIGNS OFF ON THE PLAT. THE MOTION TO APPROVE BY MEMBER FINLEY IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND BY MEMBER STEWART? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR I AND YOUR PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. OKEY DOKE. MOVING DOWN THE LINE, 
          [Items 2 & 3]
THERE ARE TWO ITEMS LISTED ON THE AGENDA. JUST FOR SAKE OF EFFICIENCY, WE WILL BE HOLDING A SINGLE PUBLIC HEARING ADDRESSING BOTH OF THE PROJECTS. SO WE HAVE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THREE, FIVE, FIVE, SIX LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT LLC REQUESTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AS WELL AS THE REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED MIXED USE SITE OFFERING CONDOMINIUMS AND RESIDENTIAL USES. JOSH, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD BEFORE WE START? I'LL LET MR. REYNOLDS, ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, KIND OF LEAD OFF THE WITH THE CHANGES THAT THEY MADE FROM THE LAST TIME, AND THEN I'LL KIND OF JUST FILL IN THE BLANKS AFTER HE'S DONE. OKAY. THANKS. GOOD EVENING. BOARD MEMBERS, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. SO YEAH, I'LL JUST GO OVER BRIEF CHANGES THAT WE MADE HERE. JUST GOING DOWN THE LIST. AND THIS WAS THIS CAME OUT OF THE THE WORK SESSION WE HAD ON JUNE 3RD, THE LAST MEETING. SO I GUESS THE FIRST ITEM WE PROVIDED A EXHIBIT FOR A TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT. ONE OF THE CONCERNS WAS ACCESS FOR DELIVERY TRUCKS TO THE HOTEL. SO WE'VE WE'VE PROVIDED THIS THIS EXHIBIT HERE SHOWING THE THE PATHWAY IN RED. YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO 
          [00:15:05]
CONFIRM, YOU KNOW, A TYPICAL BOX DELIVERY TRUCK, WHICH WE'VE GOT THE DETAILS DOWN THERE IN THE CORNER. REALLY NO ISSUE GETTING BACK TO THAT SERVICE YARD AREA THAT THAT EXISTS TODAY. THE PATH THAT WE SELECTED WOULD PROBABLY WOULD BE THE MOST USED PATH, YOU KNOW, KEEPING THOSE TRUCKS OUT OF THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THIS THIS PROPERTY. SO NO CONCERNS ON OUR END, BUT WE ARE PROVIDING IT, I GUESS THE MOVING ALONG HERE. THE NEXT ITEM WE CLARIFIED ON ALL THE DRAWINGS THAT THESE WILL BE CONDOMINIUMS, NOT TOWNHOMES. SO THE THE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO REFLECT THAT. I GUESS MOVING ON TO C 101, THE TABLES HAVE BEEN UPDATED. ONE OF THEM WAS THE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS WAS THERE WAS A A MISS A MISCALCULATION. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF BUILDINGS THAT'S BEEN UPDATED. AND THEN ALSO THE COVERAGE NUMBER 50%. WE'RE TRYING TO GET ABOVE THAT. SO WE'VE RECHECKED THAT NUMBER AND WE WERE ABLE TO GET ABOVE THAT. JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THE POOL AREA THERE WAS A MISUNDERSTANDING THERE IN THE POOL AREA THAT KIND OF THREW US UNDER THAT THAT 50% MARK. SO WE GOT THAT CORRECTED. LET ME SEE HERE, JUST GOING DOWN DOWN THE LIST, WE HAVE ENGAGED A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. I KNOW THERE WAS SEVERAL COMMENTS LAST TIME ABOUT JUST ENHANCING THE LANDSCAPE OF THE SITE. GENERALLY THE THE SITE, I GUESS I'LL START WITH THE FENCING. 
          WE'VE, WE'VE KIND OF OPENED UP THE SITE, GOTTEN RID OF THE CHAIN LINK FENCING, GOTTEN RID OF THE WROUGHT IRON FENCING, EXCEPT FOR THAT SOUTH END, THAT SOUTH EDGE IN THE CORNER THERE, AND THE MAIN ENTRY, BUT MORE OR LESS THE EAST, THE WEST AND THE NORTH END OF THE SITE HAVE BEEN OPENED UP WITH A KIND OF A STOCKADE, SPLIT RAIL TYPE FENCE. AND THEN WE'VE KIND OF ACCOMPANIED THAT WITH SOME ENHANCED LANDSCAPING. MOLLY, I THINK, DID A GREAT JOB OF KIND OF PUTTING HER TOUCH ON THIS SO THAT OBVIOUSLY MUCH BETTER, I THINK, THAN YOU SAW LAST TIME. 
          AND SHE ALSO ADJUSTED THAT TRAIL ON THE NORTH EDGE, THE PUBLIC TRAIL. I THINK SHE KIND OF SHE ADJUSTED THE ALIGNMENT TO KIND OF FLOW A LITTLE BIT BETTER. SHE PROVIDED SOME CONNECTIVITY INTO THE SITE WITH THE, THE CHANGE IN THE FENCING, THE, THE CLIENT AND THE OWNER HAS DECIDED THAT THERE WILL STILL BE A GUARD SHACK, BUT THE SECURING THE SITE WITH FENCING WILL BE KIND OF REPLACED WITH SOME, PROBABLY SOME, SOME GUARDS, YOU KNOW, SOME SECURITY THAT'LL JUST KEEP AN EYE ON THE SITE AND PROBABLY IN COMBINATION WITH SOME SECURITY CAMERAS THAT THAT PATHWAY, THAT TRAIL, PROBABLY SOME OTHER LOCATIONS ON THE SITE WILL PROBABLY HAVE SOME SIGNAGE TO PRIVATE PRIVATE PROPERTY RESIDENTS ONLY, YOU KNOW, TRY TO KEEP PEOPLE OUT OF THERE. BUT AGAIN, IT'S, YOU KNOW, SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU HAVE HAVE NOW YOU HAVE AN OPEN SITE, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE COULD WALK, WALK ON THERE NOW, BUT WE'RE KIND OF TRYING TO DEFINE IT WITH THAT, THAT SPLIT RAIL, WOOD FENCING IN THE LANDSCAPING. SO. I THINK PLANT LIST HAS BEEN PROVIDED. YOU KNOW, SHE SHE'S KIND OF GIVEN A GOOD PALETTE, YOU KNOW, SOME NATIVE SPECIES THAT, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WHEN WE GET DOWN THE ROAD, WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE A MUCH MORE DETAILED LANDSCAPING PLAN. BUT THIS GIVES, YOU KNOW, AN OVERALL PICTURE OF WHAT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT FENCING AT THE MAIN ENTRY. I'LL HIGHLIGHT THAT TOO. 
          SHE'S KIND OF SHE'S SHE'S MODIFIED THAT SINCE SHE LAST SAW IT TO KIND OF FRAME THAT MAIN ENTRY, GIVE IT KIND OF THAT ENTRY STATEMENT. SO I THINK SHE'S INCLUDED A COUPLE PILASTERS THERE. AND THEN EV CHARGING STATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE DRAWINGS. WE SHOW SOME LOCATIONS. AND THEN. A COUPLE LIGHT POLES. WE, WE ADJUSTED THOSE TO BASED ON THE LANDSCAPING, WE HAD TO KIND OF MAKE A COUPLE SHIFTS ON THOSE. AND I THINK LAST, I THINK THAT WAS THE LAST THE LAST BIG ITEM. SO. THANK YOU. JOSH, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO FILL US IN ON? THE ONLY THING THAT I'LL ALSO ADD IS THAT THIS BOARD DID ASK WHETHER IT WOULD BE LIKE A SITE PLAN CONDITION THAT I THINK IT WAS MEMBERS THAT BROUGHT UP THE CONCERN OF SHARED ACCESS. IF THE LOT DURING THE SUBDIVISION PHASE OF THIS PROJECT, IF THERE WILL BE SOME SORT OF AGREEMENT THAT'LL BE DRAFTED UP AND YOU KNOW WHERE THAT WILL COME INTO PLAY, I CERTAINLY THINK THAT CAN BE THOUGHT OF AS A SITE PLAN CONDITION IF THIS BOARD STILL WANTS THAT TO, TO BE ENFORCED. SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD ALSO ADD. I WOULD ALSO AGREE AND SUPPORT THAT AS A CONDITION. THE ONE OTHER ITEM THAT WE HAD DISCUSSED LAST TIME WAS WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCESS AND AGREEMENT WITH THE WOODLAWN STATE PARK. I BELIEVE THAT WE 
          [00:20:05]
RECEIVED A LETTER FROM STATE PARKS OUTLINING A COUPLE OF ITEMS THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS. SO WE DID. PRIOR TO THE START, OR FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING, WE DID RECEIVE A LETTER FROM WOODLAWN BEACH STATE PARK WHO HAD SOME COMMENTS RELATED TO. THEY HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO THE SITE, WHICH HAS BEEN DISCUSSED MULTIPLE TIMES. THERE IS A CONDITION, OBVIOUSLY FROM THE TOWN BOARD REZONING THAT PROOF OF ACCESS WILL NEED TO BE PART OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. OUR TOWN ATTORNEY DID SUBMIT A MEMO WHO BELIEVES THAT THAT SPECIFIC CONDITION HAS BEEN MET AT THE TOWN LEVEL LOCALLY, AND THEN IF THERE ARE ANY CONCERNS FROM STATE PARKS, THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD HAVE TO WORK THAT OUT WITH THEM OUTSIDE OF THE SITE PLAN, THE CONDITIONAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL THAT THE TOWN OF HAMBURG WOULD GRANT. SO ALSO THE IN THE LETTER THAT THE STATE PARKS MENTIONED WANTING TO KEEP ALL THE VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, THEY DID HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THEIR PLANT LIFE, WHICH I BELIEVE THE DEVELOPER AND HIS TEAM WILL NOT CHANGE, YOU KNOW, REMOVE. BUT THOSE WERE KIND OF THE GIST OF THEIR COMMENTS THAT THEY SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT. OKAY. 
          ANYTHING ELSE BEFORE WE OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING? I DO WANT TO I THINK THE DEVELOPER WANTED TO JUST SHARE A COUPLE COUPLE IMAGES, IF THAT'S OKAY, OF WHAT HIS PLANS ARE FOR THE PRIMARILY THE, THE MAIN BUILDING THAT'S GOING TO HAVE HIM COME UP AND JUST GIVE A BRIEF, BRIEF OVERVIEW JUST FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE. ARE THERE ANY OUT OF THE ALL THE RENDERS? ARE THERE ANY SPECIFIC ONES THAT YOU WANT TO BE SHOWN? YES. CAN YOU SHOW THIS ONE WHICH WHICH LIKE WHICH NAME IS THAT ONE LOUNGE MEETING ROOM FLOOR SKETCH. OKAY, THIS IS A LAYOUT OF THE BUILDING. I GUESS I'LL JUST DO IT THIS WAY. THIS IS THE GARDEN AND THIS IS THE THE SPACE. I'M SORRY. 
          YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE. YOU TAKE THE MIC WITH YOU. YEAH. THAT TOO. I FEEL LIKE A ROCK STAR. I'M GONNA GO OVER HERE THEN. SO HERE'S, YOU KNOW, HERE'S THE MAIN LOBBY AND THEN HERE'S THE GLASS BLOCK OFFICE. AND WHAT I'VE DONE IS I'VE NEGOTIATED WITH MY CURRENT TENANT, GIBRALTAR, WHERE I'M TAKING 15 WINDOWS HERE AND GIVING THEM THIS EXTRA SPACE WHICH IS VACANT UP THERE. AND WHAT THAT ENABLES US TO DO IS CREATE WHAT WOULD BE THE SECOND LARGEST MEETING AREA SPACE IN BUFFALO. 600 ZERO FEET IS A PRETTY BIG SPACE WHEN YOU START LAYING IT AGAINST THE CURRENT HOTEL'S OUT THERE. SO YOU KNOW, THIS IS 3000, THAT'S 6000. THE THEATER IS 400 ZERO SQUARE FEET. THIS ENTIRE AREA IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO HOLD HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE. YOU KNOW, THERE'S 70,000 PEOPLE THAT GO TO THE GAME. WHERE DO THESE PEOPLE GO AFTER THE GAME? I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE THEY'LL COME HERE. AND SO THIS GROUND FLOOR AREA, WHAT I'M SAYING IS THIS DID NOT EXIST BEFORE. I'VE BEEN TRYING TO REACH THEM AND NEGOTIATE. BUT THIS IS GOING TO BE PART OF THAT GLASS BLOCK OFFICE. THE SECOND IMAGE. IF YOU CAN SHOW, WOULD BE THE LOUNGE. THAT WHEN I UPLOADED IT LATE TODAY, OH, I MIGHT BE ABLE TO GRAB IT. LET'S SEE. DO DO DO DO DO DO DO DO DO. SEEMED LIKE FOR 25. LET'S SEE IF I CAN FIND IT. ON THIS ONE RIGHT HERE. OKAY, SO I WAS REFERRING TO, YOU KNOW, THE MAIN LOBBY AND THEN YOU COME IN AND THE GLASS BLOCK OFFICE, THAT'S, THAT IS BASICALLY THE CURRENTLY MY OFFICE, WHICH IS GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, A HOTEL LOBBY LOUNGE AND THEN TO THE RIGHT, IF YOU NOTICE THE GLASS, THE GARDEN IS TO THE RIGHT THERE. CAN YOU SHOW JOSHUA THE GARDEN AT FRONT? RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE GARDEN AND THE LOUNGE, YOU KNOW, WILL BE ABLE EASILY TO CONNECT, YOU KNOW, TO THAT. CAN YOU SHOW THE HOTEL LOBBY, FRONT DESK? RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE TERRAZZO FLOOR THAT'S THERE STRAIGHT THROUGH WHERE THOSE PEOPLE ARE WALKING 
          [00:25:03]
PAST THE ELEVATORS IS GOING TO BE OPENED UP. SO THERE'S GOING TO BE A LOT OF LIGHT COMING IN. 
          RIGHT NOW, IT'S JUST OFFICES, YOU KNOW, VACANT OFFICES, NOTHING GOING ON. CAN YOU SHOW THE THEATER AND CLUB? YEAH. SO WE HAVE A 240 SEAT THEATER THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, BETHLEHEM STEEL'S. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE OUT THE SEATS. WE'RE GOING TO PUT IN MORE COMFORTABLE SEATS, AND IT'S GOING TO BE A COMBINATION OF THINGS. IT'S GOING TO BE A ROOM THAT YOU COULD, YOU KNOW, CATER A WEDDING OR A, YOU COULD HAVE A CORPORATE MEETING THERE. YOU COULD WATCH THE BILLS. WHEN THE SUPER BOWL OR COMEDY SHOW ANY COMBINATION OF THINGS. IT'S A VERY USEFUL ROOM. IT'S SOUNDPROOF. IT'S NO WINDOWS. IT WAS DESIGNED TO BE THAT WAY. 
          AND I THINK IT'S VERY UNIQUE, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU WALK IN THE MAIN, YOU KNOW, THE FRONT, THE FRONT DOOR, THE MAIN ENTRANCE. AND THIS THEATER IS TO THE LEFT AND THEN THE GLASS BLOCK AND GARDEN TO THE RIGHT. SO IT'S A VERY PRETTY, VERY PRETTY SETTING AND IT'LL BE VERY, VERY FUNCTIONAL SPACE. CAN YOU HIT RESTAURANT ONE AND TWO? THAT IS THE SPACE DIRECTLY NEXT TO THE KITCHEN ON THE SECOND FLOOR. IT IT, IT'S SORT OF THE CAFETERIA WITH THE TILE FLOOR. SO TO THE LEFT IS THE ROOF OF THE THEATER. SO THAT INSTANTLY CREATES A KITCHEN, AN EATING AREA, AND AN OUTDOOR DECK WITHOUT DOING MUCH. THE KITCHEN IS IN VERY GOOD SHAPE. CAN YOU SHOW THE OTHER ONE? THE SECOND ONE? THAT SPACE IS LOOKING OUT AT THE GARDEN TO THE LEFT ON THE SECOND FLOOR. 
          THERE'S A FIREPLACE THERE BECAUSE ABOVE IT THERE'S OPEN AIR, SO WE'LL BE ABLE TO VENT IT OUT. AND I THINK THAT IT'S A VERY WARM AND WELCOMING EFFECT, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT'S COLD AND MISERABLE, YOU KNOW, QUITE A BIT IN THE WINTER. WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO COME OUT AND, YOU KNOW, GET A BITE. CAN YOU CAN YOU SHOW ME THE FOUR WINDOW ROOM? IS IT THIS TOP ONE THREE WINDOW DELUXE ROOM? YEAH. NO, THERE'S ONE THREE AND ONE FOUR SHOW YOU. YOU CAN SHOW BOTH OF THEM. YOU CAN JUST CALL IT HOTEL ROOM. OH. THIS IS ACTUALLY A UNIT THAT I'M FIXING FOR MYSELF. IT DOESN'T HAVE THE FURNITURE IN IT. IT'S GOT AN AIR MATTRESS AND SPACKLE ON THE WALL. BUT I WAS ABLE WITH THE COMPUTER FOR IT TO COME OUT AND DECORATE IT. MID-CENTURY MODERN STYLE. THERE'S NOT A LOT OF ITEMS IN THERE. A LOT, NOT A LOT OF ITEMS FOR PEOPLE TO TAKE ON THE WAY OUT EITHER. WE WANT TO JUST GIVE PEOPLE GOOD SHEETS, GOOD BED, GOOD QUALITY, AND JUST GREAT FOOD AND GREAT SERVICE. CAN YOU SHOW THE THREE? I WAS DEAD SET ON GOING WITH JUST FOUR WINDOWS TO GIVE PEOPLE EXTRA SPACE. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A LOT OF SPACE, SO GIVE IT EXTRA. BUT THAT'S A THREE WINDOW ROOM. AND ON 1 OR 2, 1 OR 2 FLOORS WE MAY GO WITH THE THREE WINDOW. THERE'LL BE MORE AFFORDABLE. WE'LL GET A FEW EXTRA ROOMS, YOU KNOW, AND SO AND THEN THE BACK. OH CAN YOU SHOW JOSH SEVENTH FLOOR FRONT. THE THE, THE TOP FLOOR IN THE BUILDING IS SEVEN. THERE'S ONLY ONE OTHER BUILDING WITH A TOP FLOOR OF SEVEN. THAT'S THE LECOM HOTEL. I WAS JUST THERE LAST WEEK FOR THE FIRST TIME, WHICH IS WHY I DECIDED NOT TO WAIT FOR A LAW FIRM TO LEASE THE TOP FLOOR, BUT I'M GOING TO CONVERT IT TO THIS, WHICH THE FRONT OF IT IS LIKE 600 ZERO FEET. NO COLUMNS OPEN. BEAUTIFUL VIEW OF THE LAKE. AND IF YOU CAN PUT THE RESTAURANT FILLED ONE RIGHT, YOU HAVE THAT ONE. SO YOU KNOW THE FLOOR PLATE ON THE TOWER IS A RECTANGLE. YOU KNOW, IT'S ABOUT 100 ZERO FOOT RECTANGLE 78FT BY THE DISTANCE. SO THE FRONT PART CLOSEST TO THE BEACH IS GOING TO BE WHAT YOU JUST SAW. AND THEN IN THE CENTER OF THE FLOOR PLATE, YOU'VE GOT THE STAIRCASES, THE ELEVATORS, ALL OF THAT STUFF, WHICH SORT OF BREAKS UP THE FLOOR. SO ON THE SOUTH SIDE, FACING SOUTH. IS THERE ANOTHER ONE YOU WANT ME TO SHOW? YEAH. RESTAURANT FILLED. DO YOU HAVE THAT ONE THERE? YEAH. RIGHT. SO THAT'S THE, YOU KNOW, WHERE THE WITH THE SUSHI GUYS ARE IS SORT OF 
          [00:30:05]
WHERE LIKE THE ELEVATORS ARE BEHIND THEM AND ALL OF THAT. SO THAT'S THAT SECTION THERE. I ALREADY HAVE THESE PEOPLE. IT'S NOT LIKE I HAVE TO GO LOOK FOR THEM. I'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR RESTAURATEURS AND PEOPLE FOR TWO YEARS NOW. AND SO THESE PEOPLE DO A FANTASTIC JOB. I'M ALSO PARTNERING UP WITH A LOCAL GROUP HERE THAT HAVE MULTIPLE RESTAURANTS IN BUFFALO, FLORIDA, LAS VEGAS. THEY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING, THE YOUNG GUYS, AND THEY UNDERSTAND FOOD VERY WELL. THEY'RE ALSO VERY EXCITED ABOUT COMING OFF A LOW MARGIN BUSINESS, WHICH IS WHAT THEY CURRENTLY HAVE, AND ELEVATING THE THE TYPE OF FOOD THAT'S GOING TO BE SERVED. ALL RIGHT, SO BIRD'S EYE BLUE TRIM. AND THERE'S THE MONEY SHOT. THOSE ARE CHERRY BLOSSOMS. I WAS TOLD THEY DON'T DO WELL IN HAMBURG. SO WE'RE GOING TO PLANT SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR TO THAT. 
          THE FENCING THE WOOD FENCING IS WHAT WE DISCUSSED THE LAST TIME, THE CORRAL TYPE OF FENCING. 
          IT'S COUNTRY. IT'S VERY NICE. I HAVE CONTRACTED WITH SOMEONE TO DO THAT. THE PRICE HE GAVE ME WAS GOOD. SO I DECIDED TO DO ALL THREE SIDES AND DO AWAY WITH THE. LIKE YOU SAID, WE WANT TO MAKE IT OPEN FOR THE FOR THE COMMUNITY. AND I THINK THAT A WROUGHT IRON FENCE JUST DOESN'T DO THAT. EVEN IF IT WAS LESS EXPENSIVE. THIS IS MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE AND MORE WELCOMING AT THE SAME TIME. YOU KNOW, IF SOMEONE WANTS TO HOP THE FENCE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A SECURITY PERSON THERE WITH A WALKIE TALKIE, YOU KNOW, AND WE'RE GOING TO MANAGE IT THAT WAY. I THINK THAT'S A BETTER, A BETTER SOLUTION. I PUT A DOZEN EVS, THINGS IN THE BACK THERE BECAUSE IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT WITH THE COMPUTER TO PUT THEM FROM THE ANGLE LIKE THAT. RIGHT. 
          BUT BUT TOM, SO TOM HAS A GOOD SPOT FOR THEM. AND ACTUALLY I COMMEND YOU. THERE WAS A GREAT SUGGESTION. I HAD NOT THOUGHT OF IT, THE EV CHARGERS, BECAUSE WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS WE'RE GOING TO GIVE CANADIANS FREE CHARGING ON THE WAY UP, YOU KNOW, TO BRING THEM IN. SO, YOU KNOW, YOU WANT TO COME STAY AT THE HOTEL, YOU GET A FREE CHARGE AND PARK ACCESS ROAD IMPROVED. YOU ASKED ME TO BEAUTIFY OUR SIDE, WHICH IS THE LEFT, BECAUSE LIKE YOU SAID, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT OUR SIDE. SO MAYBE YOU GUYS WILL BEAUTIFY YOUR SIDE TOO. SO WHEN WE LOOK, WE CAN LOOK AT A NICE OUTCOME AND DO SOMETHING JOINTLY. IT DOESN'T TAKE MUCH TO DO THAT. RIGHT. AND I THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND ALSO THE RESPONSIVENESS THAT YOU'VE HAD TO OUR COMMENTS FROM OUR LAST MEETING. SO I THINK THAT AT THAT POINT, AT THIS POINT, WE SHOULD START THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. YEP. THANK YOU. AUGGIE, COULD YOU READ THE TWO PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES, PLEASE? LEGAL NOTICE, TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN. APPROVAL NOTICES. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD WILL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXED USE SITE OFFERING CONDOMINIUMS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AND COMMERCIAL USES SUCH AS RESTAURANTS, HOTEL SPACE AND THE CONTINUING USE OF SOME OF THE EXISTING OFFICE SPACE AT THE GATEWAY BUILDING, TO BE LOCATED AT 3556 LAKESHORE ROAD. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 17TH, 2026 AT 7 P.M. IN ROOM SEVEN A AND SEVEN B OF THE HAMBURG TOWN HALL. LEGAL NOTICE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD WILL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSAL OF A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE LOCATED AT 3556 LAKESHORE ROAD. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 17TH, 2026 AT 7 P.M. IN ROOM SEVEN A AND SEVEN B OF THE HAMBURG TOWN BOARD. THANK YOU. 
          AS A REMINDER, PUBLIC HEARING IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE COMMUNITY TO SHARE INFORMATION ON HOW THEY ARE IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT. A THREE MINUTE RULE WILL APPLY. IT IS NOT A QUESTION AND ANSWER PERIOD. ALL STATEMENTS MADE DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, AS WELL AS WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE PROJECTS, WILL BE SENT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING BOARD AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON 3556 LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL? GOING TWICE. ANYONE HERE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT? AND THREE TIMES? ANYONE HERE TO 
          [00:35:04]
PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON 3556 LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. OKAY HEARING NO COMMENTS. WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY, JOSH, WHAT ARE OUR NEXT STEPS? JUST TO CLARIFY, WE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR BOTH SITE PLAN AND SUBDIVISION. BOTH THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN CLOSED. NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED FOR EITHER. NOW THAT THE THE ONLY COMMENT THAT WE GOT WAS FROM THE STATE PARK. BUT OUTSIDE OF THAT, NOTHING FROM HERE. THE STEPS NOW ARE FOR THE BOARD TO DISCUSS ANY POTENTIAL SITE PLAN CONDITIONS THAT YOU WOULD WANT, AND IF YOU WOULD WANT TO AUTHORIZE ME TO DRAFT AN APPROVAL RESOLUTION FOR OUR JULY 1ST PLANNING BOARD MEETING. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? I DO, AND IT'S BASED ON THE STATE'S LETTER. ONE OF THEIR COMMENTS WAS ABOUT LANDSCAPING AND THE DUNES, AND THEY DID BRING UP AN INTERESTING ISSUE THAT WE DON'T SEE ALL THAT OFTEN WHERE THEY DIDN'T, THEY WORRIED ABOUT INVASIVE SPECIES OR PLANTS THAT COULD END UP ON THEIR PROPERTY. SO I THINK AS A CONDITION, IF THE APPLICANT COULD SEND THE LIST OF THE PLANTS THEY'RE GOING TO PUT IN FOR LANDSCAPING, AND THE PARK CAN LOOK AT THOSE TO APPROVE IT, BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW WHICH PLANTS, WHERE THE SEEDS WILL FLY BY THE WIND OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. AND I DON'T WANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT. YEAH. NO, I THINK THAT'S A GOOD I A GOOD SUGGESTION. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. MEMBER FINDLEY, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? WELL, ONE QUESTION WITH ALL THE ADDED SPACE AND PEOPLE, I WAS JUST WONDERING PARKING, IS IT GOING TO BE AFFECTED IN PARKING SPOTS WHEN WE'RE ADDING A YOU KNOW, YOU GOT THE THEATER AND NOW THIS BIG CONVENTION CENTER, YOU HAVE RESTAURANTS AND YOU ALSO HAVE PEOPLE WHO ARE STAYING AT THE HOTEL AND THE PEOPLE WHO OWN THE CONDOMINIUMS. HOW ARE WE GOING FROM THERE? TOM OR ANDY, CAN EITHER ONE OF YOU SPEAK TO HOW MANY PARKING SPACES ARE PROPOSED AND HOW YOU KIND OF SETTLED ON THAT NUMBER? I KNOW WE'VE GOT THAT PARKING TALLY SHOWN ON THE ON THE PLAN THERE. LET'S SEE. SO. AND I, I RECALL THAT PARKING NUMBER WAS, I THINK IT WAS CARRIED OVER FROM IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED SLIGHTLY, SLIGHTLY, BUT IT WAS FROM THE PUD. IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, IT WENT DOWN IN SPACING SPACES, NOT UP. OKAY. YEAH. SO IT LOOKS LIKE A TOTAL OF 863 TOTAL STALLS. I DO BELIEVE. REMEMBER I WANT TO SAY IT WAS 903 FROM THE PUD WAS APPROVED IN 2024. YES. SO IT IS A SLIGHT REDUCTION. OKAY. WHAT WAS THE TOTAL FROM THE PEE DEE. 
          DON'T QUOTE ME, BUT I THINK IT WAS LIKE 903. YEAH, I CAN ASSURE. SO WITH THE REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF SPACES, DO ONE DO YOU HAVE ANY OPPORTUNITY, DO YOU THINK IN ORDER TO ADD IN. I MEAN, THAT'S A DECENT NUMBER OF SPACES, BUT ALSO WE'RE PUSHING FOR, YOU KNOW, A GREATER LANDSCAPE AND SO FORTH. I GUESS WONDERING THE REST OF THE BOARD'S COMMENTS OR THOUGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THAT REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF SPOTS? I MEAN, USUALLY INCREASED PARKING IS AT THE COST OF GREEN SPACE. SO IF THEY THINK THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH LESS AND GO WITH THEIR NUMBER. YEAH. OKAY. AND PART OF THAT MAY HAVE CHANGED WITH THE AND I CAN GO BACK AND DOUBLE CHECK ON THIS, BUT UNDER THE BUILDING THERE WAS PARKING PLANNED. SO THAT MAY HAVE CHANGED WITH THE. I THINK THERE WAS A CHANGE IN ARCHITECTURE. SO THAT MAY HAVE REDUCED THE NUMBER OF SPACES UNDER THE BUILDING. AND ALSO AS THE PLANNING BOARD, WE. REMIND ME OF OUR ROLE WITH RESPECT TO DICTATING OR NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS. SO WE USED TO HAVE A PARKING GUIDANCE DOCUMENT THAT USED TO BE LIKE ONE SPACE FOR TWO SEATS IN A RESTAURANT, BUT THEN WE REPEALED THAT PARKING GUIDELINE, AND NOW PARKING IS UNDER THE DISCRETION OF THE PLANNING BOARD, WHERE BASED OFF OF USES ACREAGE SITES. A LOT OF TIMES WE ASK PEOPLE TO SUBMIT A PARKING MEMO OR SOME SORT OF KIND OF PARKING REPORT ALL THE WAY UP TO A WHOLE TRAFFIC STUDY AND USING ALL THAT INFORMATION TO COME UP WITH A RATIONALE DECISION ON HOW MUCH PARKING THIS BOARD FEELS IS APPROPRIATE FOR OUR SITE. AND REMIND ME, DO WE HAVE A PARKING MEMO FOR THIS 
          [00:40:02]
PROJECT? I WAS NOT A PART OF THE VERY EARLY PART OF IT WHEN THE WAS BEING ESTABLISHED. SO THAT'S WHERE I FEEL LIKE I'M SLIGHTLY AT A LOSS THERE. THERE OBVIOUSLY HAS BEEN A TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT. AND WHEN IT WAS REZONED BACK IN 2024, THERE WAS, AT LEAST AT THE TOWN BOARD LEVEL, A BUNCH OF DISCUSSIONS ON HAVING ADEQUATE PARKING AT THAT TIME. SO BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THERE WAS EVER AN OFFICIAL PARKING MEMO. NO, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT WAS SUBMITTED IN THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL. WE STILL HAVE THE UPDATED TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT AS WELL TOO. HOW MANY ROOMS WERE THE HOTEL HAVE? DID YOU WANT TO. HE'S GOT THE BETTER RESPONSE THERE GOES TO THE PARKING. THERE'S GOING TO BE 65 SUITES. SO THAT'S ONE ROOM. ONE SPACE. YEAH. FOR A HOTEL IT'S ONE THERE'S NO CONDOMINIUMS IN THE BUILDING. THERE'S A RATIO FOR OFFICE SPACE. THERE'S A RATIO FOR ALL THAT. OKAY. THE THE, THE PROPERTY HAS 650 SPACES. WE'RE ENDING UP WITH ALMOST 900 SPACES. I THINK WE'LL TAKE OUR CHANCES. UNLESS YOU WANT TO START DELETING BUILDINGS OR YOU WANT TO COMPROMISE OPEN SPACE FOR THE SAKE OF HOUSING MORE CARS. IF PEOPLE COME AND THERE'S NO SPACES, MAYBE THEY'LL COME BACK LATER. MAYBE THEY'LL COME BACK ANOTHER DAY. IT REALLY SHOULD BE THE WORST OF OUR PROBLEMS THAT WE HAVE SUCH A FULL HOUSE FOR 900, ALMOST 900 SPACES. I MEAN, LOOK, THIS ISN'T A SCIENCE. THIS 25 ACRES, THERE'S RULES, SETBACKS. WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CONDOMINIUM, THERE'S ONLY SO MUCH YOU CAN DO WITH FOUR WALLS. AND WHEN YOU REALLY CRANK IT DOWN, THIS IS THE SUMMATION OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS SPENT PERSONALLY TO GET THE DEAL. DESPITE THE DELAYS, DESPITE THE RIGHT, I UNDERSTAND RIGHT THAT HARDSHIP THAT YOU'VE GONE THROUGH, THERE'S NO HARDSHIP. IT'S JUST THAT WE HAVE 900 SPACES. KEY QUESTION IS IF THE CHANGE IN THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS ALIGNING WITH THE USES THAT YOU HAVE ADEQUATELY PROVIDE THE AMOUNT OF SPACE AVAILABLE. AND SO I AM COMFORTABLE WITH THE WAY THAT THE NUMBERS HAVE LINED UP, THE WAY THAT THE USES ARE LINED UP. 
          ALSO RECOGNIZING THAT YOUR THE CONDOMINIUMS ARE KIND OF SELF SERVED WITH THEIR OWN PARKING AVAILABLE. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I SPENT OVER 60 YEARS IN FOOD MANAGEMENT BUSINESS. YOU'VE GOT AMPLE PARKING TURNOVER IN THE RESTAURANT. I MEAN, THEY'RE GOING TO COME FOR DINNER. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO SPEND THE EVENING THERE. THAT'S RIGHT. 
          YOU KNOW, SO I THINK YOU'RE OKAY WITH YOUR PARKING STUDY. THE STUDIES ARE GOING TO BE THE HOTEL PEOPLE. LET'S SAY IT'S A FULL HOTEL. THE 6580 SPACE IS TAKEN. WE'VE GOT A LOT OF ROOM MEMBER, CLERK. I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY, AS FAR AS THE PARKING GOES, SOMETIMES WE HAD TO THINK OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF, MORE THAN THAT, MANY CARS WERE THERE. FOR SOME REASON IN THIS SPACE, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE SECURITY. THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE CARS BACKING UP ONTO A BUSY ROAD. 
          THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DRIVE ON THE LANDSCAPE. SOMEBODY WILL SHOO THEM OFF. IT'S DIFFERENT THAN MAYBE LIKE LIKE AN ICE CREAM PARLOR ON ROUTE FIVE, WHERE IF TOO MANY PEOPLE PARK THERE, THERE'S CARS IN A ROAD AND IT'S DANGEROUS AND IT HAS A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES, TRAFFIC PATTERNS AND SO FORTH. MEMBER STEWART, COULD THEY UTILIZE THE PARKING THAT THEY HAVE AT WOODLAWN BEACH AND JUST WALK OVER? THAT'D BE BETWEEN THEM AND LONG BEACH. THAT'S WOULD BE BETWEEN THE THE DEVELOPER AND WOODLAWN BEACH IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH AN AGREEMENT, BUT NOT BEING CONTEMPLATED AT THIS TIME FOR THIS PROJECT. AND JUST TO CLARIFY, SO WE HAVE AN ACCURATE RECORD. THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL HAD 907 SPACES. SO JUST SO WE'RE AT A VERY INSIGNIFICANT DECREASE OVER THE COURSE OF THE SIZE OF THE PROJECT. OKAY, SO NEXT UP IS WILL AUTHORIZE JOSH TO DRAFT APPROVAL APPROVAL RESOLUTIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. OKAY. FOR FOR FOR JULY 1ST. YES. I MEAN, I SAY YES, BUT RECOGNIZING WE ALREADY HAD THAT ON THE AGENDA. DID I'M ASKING IF WE DID. YEAH WE DID. 
          OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YEP. THANK YOU VERY MUCH ON THE FIRST. THANK YOU. MR. OKEY DOKE. MOVING DOWN 
          [4. Public Hearing – 7:00 P.M., Seven (7) Brew Coffee – Requesting Site Plan Approval of  a proposal to construct a 510 sq-ft building with two drive-thru lanes to be located on a  0.78-acre parcel at 3701 McKinley Parkway (SBL #: 160.07-2-28.2) ]
THE LINE. OUR NEXT PUBLIC HEARING IS SEVEN BREW COFFEE, REQUESTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 510 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH TWO DRIVE THRU LANES TO BE LOCATED AT POINT AT A 0.7 ACRE. AT 3701 MCKINLEY PARKWAY. HELLO MR. PANDOLFI, GOOD EVENING. 
          ANTHONY PANDOLFI WITH CARMINA WOOD, DESIGN PROJECT ENGINEER. I CAN GO OVER THE PROJECT AGAIN IF YOU GUYS WANT TO, BUT WE'RE JUST HERE TWO WEEKS AGO, SO I'LL JUST TOUCH ON THE COUPLE 
          [00:45:01]
UPDATES WE WE MADE. WE'RE NOT REALLY UPDATES, JUST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. I GUESS WE SUBMITTED ONE BEING COLORED RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED SEVEN BREW. THESE ARE TYPICAL OF THE OTHER LOCATIONS TO KIND OF MAINTAIN THAT BRAND IMAGE. AND THEN THE SECOND THING WE SUBMITTED WAS A TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. AS WE DISCUSSED DURING THOSE FIRST COUPLE MONTHS WHEN THEY FIRST OPENED, THEY TEND TO SEE THEY TEND TO GET QUITE BUSY, SEE A LARGE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC. SO WE DID SUBMIT A TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN ON HOW WE WOULD MANAGE THAT TRAFFIC ON THE MALL PROPERTY, SO THAT NO TRAFFIC SPILLS INTO MCKINLEY PARKWAY. 
          AND REALLY, I THINK THAT WAS IT. SO IF THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS TIME, I CAN TAKE THEM. JOSH, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? NOTHING. SINCE LAST TIME, I WOULD SAY IT WAS NICE TO SEE LIKE THE CONSISTENCY OF WHERE THE, HOW THE TRAFFIC PATTERN IS GOING TO GO WITH THE CURB CUT WELL, THE EXISTING CURB CUT AND ENTRYWAY. SO YES, WITH THAT MEMBER. TRACY, WOULD YOU READ THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE, LEGAL NOTICE, TOWN OF HAMBURG. 
          PLANNING BOARD SITE PLAN APPROVAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD WILL CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 510 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH TWO DRIVE THRU LANES TO BE LOCATED ON A .78 ACRE PARCEL AT 3701 MCKINLEY PARKWAY. SB L NUMBER 160.07-2-28.2. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 17TH, 2026 AT 7 P.M. IN ROOM SEVEN A AND SEVEN B OF THE HAMBURG TOWN BOARD. THANK YOU. 
          IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD WISH TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE SEVEN BREW COFFEE PROJECT? SECOND CALL ANYONE PRESENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE SEVEN BREW COFFEE PROJECT. THIRD CALL ANYONE HERE TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON SEVEN BREW COFFEE. 
          OKAY, HEARING AND SEEING NONE. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEVEN BREW COFFEE. AND JOSH, WHAT IS OUR NEXT STEP? SO THIS ONE WE DIDN'T DO APPROVAL RESOLUTIONS BECAUSE YOU GUYS WANT TO SEE THE RENDERS AND SOME OF THE CIRCULATION PLANS. SO IF YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE, YOU CAN AUTHORIZE THE DRAFTING OF APPROVAL RESOLUTIONS FOR THE JULY 11TH JULY 1ST MEETING. 
          THIS PROJECT WAS EARMARKED EARMARKED FOR THAT MEETING. OKAY. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS BEFORE DRAFTING? ARE THERE ANY SPECIFIC SITE PLAN CONDITIONS THAT ANY BOARD MEMBER WOULD JUST WANT ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME? NO, NO. OKAY. THANK YOU. 
          ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS BEFORE WE MOVE ON? NO. OKEY DOKE. JOSH, YOU PROVE TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION AND WE'LL SEE YOU ON THE FIRST. YES. YEP. THANK YOU. OKEY DOKE. MOVING ON. 
          [5. Golf Carts Unlimited – Requesting Site Plan Approval of a proposal to construct a  4,700 sq-ft 1-story building with a 1,350 sq-ft covered patio to be located at 2330  Lakeview Road]
WE HAVE GOLF CARTS UNLIMITED. SO GOLF CARTS UNLIMITED REQUIRING REQUESTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 4700 SQUARE FOOT, ONE STORY BUILDING WITH A 1300 SQUARE FOOT COVERED PATIO TO BE LOCATED AT 2330 LAKEVIEW ROAD. THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT. HELLO, JOSH, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE FOR US TO DISCUSS OR ADD? LAST TIME WE HAD THE PUBLIC HEARING, I DON'T THINK THERE WAS A SINGLE PERSON THAT SPOKE. OH NO. YEAH, WE HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING. LAST TIME NOBODY SPOKE, A DRAFT APPROVAL RESOLUTION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE BOARD. 
          EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE A HARD COPY. AND WE CAN TALK ABOUT POTENTIAL SITE PLAN CONDITIONS AS THIS BOARD FEELS COMFORTABLE. OKEY DOKE. CAMI, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD AND OR THE DATE OF YOUR LETTER? SO THE LETTER WOULD BE DATED JUNE 12TH. OKAY. BUT AT THIS TIME I HAVE NO ENGINEERING QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. OKAY. BOARD MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS COMMENTS, ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS WE'D LIKE TO DISCUSS. MEMBER. RYAN, THE OUTDOOR STORAGE. WOULD THAT STILL IN EFFECT FROM THE BEFORE, OR IS THAT SOMETHING WE NEED TO PUT ON THE NEW ONE? THERE'S SOMETHING FOR THIS BOARD TO THINK ABOUT FOR BECAUSE THIS IS A REBUILD OF HIS PRIOR PROJECT AND THEN OBVIOUSLY AN ADDITION OF A COVERED PATIO. SO THAT'S SOMETHING FOR THE BOARD TO 
          [00:50:01]
THINK ABOUT. I GUESS, JOE, I WOULD ASK YOU THAT QUESTION THAT IF FOR A PREVIOUS PROJECT, OR IS THIS LIKE A NEW SLATE, NEW PROJECT, NEW NEW RULES? UNFORTUNATELY, OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION, BUT IT WOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE IF THE BOARD WERE TO PUT IT IN AGAIN. IF THE BOARD WANTS IT, OKAY, WHETHER IT WOULD REMAIN OR NOT, I, I DON'T KNOW, BUT IF IT'S SOMETHING THE BOARD WANTS TO CONTINUE, THEN JUST PUT IT IN, OKAY? OKAY. PRIOR TO I'M SORRY, MEMBER CLARK, PRIOR TO THE BOARD SPEAKING. MR. PARSON, CAN YOU SPEAK TO THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVING THE DISPLAY OF YOUR GOLF CARTS ON YOUR PROPERTY AND WHY IT'S IMPORTANT TO YOU JUST SO THAT THE BOARD IS AWARE? SO, YES, I MEAN, OUR DURING THE SUMMER WHEN WE'RE OUT THERE, WE DO HAVE CARTS ON DISPLAY OUTSIDE. WE'VE GOT CUSTOMERS IN. 
          WE SHOW THEM THE CARTS, THEY RIDE THEM AROUND OUR PROPERTY. SO IT IS IMPORTANT TO HAVE, YOU KNOW, CARTS ON THE LOT. OKAY. AND THAT WAS GOING TO BE TOWARDS MY COMMENT. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NO OUTDOOR STORAGE AND DISPLAYS. WE BOBCAT A BUFFALO. WE SAID NO OUTDOOR STORAGE, BUT THEY DO HAVE DISPLAY VEHICLES. I THINK IT'S CLOSED NOW. THERE'S A PLACE THAT HAD THE TRAILERS THAT'S NOW I THINK DINOSAUR WHERE WE SAID NO OUTDOOR STORAGE, BUT THEY DID HAVE DISPLAY VEHICLES. SO CODE ENFORCEMENT, EVEN THOUGH WE HAD NO OUTDOOR STORAGE, DID INTERPRET THAT. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DISPLAYS AND OUTDOOR STORAGE. 
          OKAY. I WOULD CERTAINLY RECOMMEND FOR THE BOARD JUST BECAUSE I DEAL WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT ALL THE TIME, THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO GO THAT ROUTE BEING AS SPECIFIC AS POSSIBLE, SO NO OUTDOOR STORAGE, BUT THEN MAYBE HAVING A CONDITION THAT OUTDOOR DISPLAY WILL BE PERMITTED JUST SO THAT IT'S CRYSTAL CLEAR AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT. 
          SO THEY HAVE TO MAKE LESS INTERPRETATIONS. I WOULD AGREE WITH ADDING THAT ANY OTHER MEMBERS COMMENTS AGREE. I AGREE WITH THAT. SO ADDING SO ADDING THERE SHALL BE NO OUTDOOR STORAGE, BUT OUTDOOR DISPLAY OF GOLF CARTS SHALL BE PERMITTED. YES. YES. RIGHT. NO OUTDOOR STORAGE PERMITTED. NO. OH TWO ORANGE. IS IT. NO OUTDOOR STORAGE PERMITTED OR ALLOWED. 
          ALLOWED OR PERMITTED. IT DOESN'T MATTER. OKAY. COMMA, I DON'T KNOW IF I PUT BUT I'LL JUST SAY DISPLAY OUTDOOR DISPLAYS ARE PERMISSIBLE. JUST OUTDOOR DISPLAY OR DO YOU WANT TO SPECIFY IT OR JUST OUTDOOR DISPLAY? I'LL JUST SAY OUTDOOR DISPLAY IS. OKAY. HOW ABOUT THIS? SORRY, OUTDOOR STORAGE IS NOT PERMITTED. OUTDOOR DISPLAYS. WAIT. OUTDOOR DISPLAYS. YOU KNOW WHAT? IT'S FINE. OKAY. I WAS JUST TRYING TO WORDSMITH IT. TO MAKE IT REALLY SIMPLE. 
          YOU'RE ON TO SOMETHING. YEAH. SO THAT IT READS. YEAH. OUTDOOR STORAGE IS NOT PERMITTED, OUTDOOR DISPLAY IS PERMITTED AND IT'S JUST TWO AND DONE. SO OUTDOOR. NICE. DO YOU WANT IT TO CHANGE? OUTDOOR IS NOT PERMITTED. OUTDOOR DISPLAYS IS PERMITTED. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A. OR ARE WE ALL SET BOARD MEMBERS. YES YES YES. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. 
          MEMBER. STEWART. MAKE A MOTION FOR GOLF CARTS AND LIMITED. 2330 LAKEVIEW ROAD APPROVAL RESOLUTION JUNE 17TH, 2021. SPEAKER. WHEREAS, THE TOWN OF HAMBURG RECEIVED SITE PLAN APPLICATION FROM MARK PARSON REQUESTING SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 4700 SQUARE FOOT, ONE STORY BUILDING WITH A 1350 SQUARE FOOT COVERED PATIO TO BE LOCATED AT 2330 LAKEVIEW ROAD. 
          AND WHEREAS, THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HELD THE REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 3RD, 2026 AND RECEIVED NO OBJECTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. AND WHEREAS, THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW YORK STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT, SEQRA HAS DONE A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE PROJECT AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND COMPLETED PARTS TWO AND THREE OF THE E, A, F AND WHEREAS THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEGRA, HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE STATE AND OR THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC AND IS CONSISTENT 
          [00:55:06]
WITH SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS. NOW THERE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HEREBY DETERMINES THAT THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN, APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 4700 SQUARE FOOT, ONE STORY BUILDING WITH A 1350 SQUARE FOOT COVERED PATIO IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS HEREBY ISSUED AND THAT THE PLANNING BOARD CHAIR IS AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE EAF, WHICH WILL ACT AS THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION. IS THERE A SECOND MEMBER, RYAN, SECONDS IT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OKAY. NEXT UP. THANK YOU. OH, ALMOST. WE GOT ONE MORE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SITE PLAN APPROVAL. BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE GOLF CARTS UNLIMITED REBUILD PROJECT. AND HAVING COMPLETED THE SECRET PROCESS, THE HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HEREBY APPROVES THE PROJECT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND DETERMINATIONS. APPROVAL IS CONTINGENT UPON THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COMMENT LETTER DATED JUNE 12TH, 2026. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS IS NOT WARRANTED AND OUTDOOR STORAGE IS NOT PERMITTED. OUTDOOR DISPLAY IS PERMITTED. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND MEMBER SECONDS THE MOTION. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. AND YOUR MOTION IS APPROVED. YOU'RE ALL SET NOW. 
          THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. I GUESS WE DIDN'T NEED TO MAKE HIM STAND THERE FOR BOTH OF 
          [6. Ten Lives Club Inc. – Requesting Change of Use and Site Plan Approval for the  expansion of rescue services to be located at 3747 Lakeshore Road]
THEM. NEXT UP, TEN LIVES CLUB REQUESTING CHANGE OF USE AND SITE PLAN. APPROVAL FOR THE EXPANSION OF RESCUE SERVICES. TO BE LOCATED AT 3747 LAKESHORE ROAD. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? THE ATTORNEY FOR THE TEN LIVES CLUB COULD NOT BE HERE TONIGHT. OKAY, SO WE ARE GOING THROUGH WITH CHANGE OF USE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. JOSH, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD BEFORE WE START DISCUSSING? I'LL JUST ADD THAT FOR FOR THIS PROJECT, AS YOU MENTIONED, THIS ONE IS CHANGE OF USE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. WE DID HAVE THE APPLICANT PREVIOUSLY AMEND THE PARKING LAYOUT JUST FOR IT TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE ACCURATE TO KIND OF SHOW HOW IT'S LAID OUT. I BELIEVE THERE'S 100 PARKING SPACES, WHICH SHOULD BE MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR A RESCUE FACILITY. THE ONLY THING THAT I'LL ADD UNDER THE RESOLUTION ITSELF IS YOU'LL SEE THAT THERE'S A REFERENCE TO SECRET WAS ALREADY CONDUCTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD PRIOR TO THEM GETTING ISSUED A USE VARIANCE FROM THE ZONING BOARD. AND THEN IN TERMS OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE CHANGE OF USE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL, I KNOW PREVIOUSLY THERE WERE SOME QUESTIONS FROM SOME BOARD MEMBERS ABOUT THE USES THAT WERE APPROVED IN THE USE VARIANCE FOR THIS PROJECT. 
          I DON'T KNOW IF BOARD MEMBERS WANT TO HAVE ANY CONDITIONS ABOUT, SIMILAR TO WHAT WE'VE DONE WITH OTHER PROJECTS, THAT IF THERE IS ANY KIND OF DEVIATION OF USE THAT YOU KNOW, THAT WOULD, YOU KNOW, SIGNAL A CHANGE THAT WOULD ACTUALLY BE A CHANGE TO THE USE VARIANCE IF THEY HAVE A DIFFERENCE IN THE USES. SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO CODIFY THAT IN THE SITE PLAN CONDITION, OR IF YOU JUST WANT TO LEAVE IT EXISTING, OR IF THERE'S ANY OTHER CONDITIONS THAT THE BOARD WANTS TO ADD. OKEY DOKE. CAMI, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? DON'T THINK SO. 
          BECAUSE THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE. THERE'S REALLY NOT ENGINEERING INVOLVED. SO THERE IS NO ENGINEERING COMMENT LETTER. AND ALSO THE SITE PLAN NOTHING CHANGING. OKAY. AND BOARD MEMBERS ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. OPINION ON JOSH'S RECOMMENDATION WITH RESPECT TO ANY FUTURE CHANGES. I HAVE NONE. I WOULD JUST SAY WITH I MEAN, I DO BELIEVE THAT THERE'S ALREADY A PROCESS IN PLACE THAT IN THE EVENT THAT THE USE CHANGES, IT WILL TRIGGER THE THE PROCESS THAT'S ALREADY IN PLACE. SO I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED TO REITERATE WHAT IS ALREADY EXISTING. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY. ANY OTHER THOUGHTS OR COMMENTS? I AGREE WITH THAT. 
          OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO NO ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS. AND IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS A MOTION TO APPROVE. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE MEMBER STEWART. SECOND. WELL, WE GOT TO READ IT FIRST. I'M SORRY. TEN LIVES CLUB, 3747 LAKESHORE ROAD. CHANGE OF USE AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL. JUNE 17TH, 2026. WHEREAS, THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FROM TEN LIVES CLUBS FOR THE EXPANSION OF FELINE RESCUE SERVICES TO UTILIZE AN EXISTING BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 3747 LAKESHORE ROAD, ALONG WITH THE OTHER 
          [01:00:02]
ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS. AND WHEREAS THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HELD THE REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 3RD, 2026. AND WHEREAS, THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD HAS REVIEWED REVIEWED THE PROJECT AGAINST THE TOWN CODE, HAS RECEIVED INPUT FROM TOWN DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES. HAS RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SLASH REPORTS FROM THE APPLICANT AND PROVIDED INPUT TO THE APPLICANT. AND WHEREAS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART 617 OF THE IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ARTICLE EIGHT SEQRA OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD, DURING ITS MARCH 4TH, 2026 MEETING, ISSUED A SECRET NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROJECT. AND WHEREAS, THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GRANTED A USE VARIANCE FOR THIS PROJECT DURING ITS MAY 5TH, 2026 MEETING. NOW THERE. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THE TOWN OF HAMBURG PLANNING BOARD ISSUES CHANGE OF USE AND CONDITIONAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. SIDEWALKS ARE NOT WARRANTED AS THEY ALREADY EXIST ALONG LAKESHORE ROAD. IS THERE A SECOND? MEMBERS. SECOND, SECOND BY MEMBER ZAJAC? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. OKAY. THE MOTION HAS BEEN APPROVED. OKEY DOKE. MOVING DOWN. NEXT UP, CHRIS VAN 
          [7. Chris Van Leaven – Requesting Preliminary Plat Approval on a proposal for a 4-lot  subdivision to be located at 4261 Lakeshore Road (SBL #: 159.17-1-16.1)]
LEVIN REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL ON A PROPOSAL FOR A FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE LOCATED AT 4261 LAKESHORE ROAD. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES. OKAY. COME ON UP. YES. JOSH, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE TO ADD BEFORE WE DIVE IN? SURE. SO FOR THIS PROJECT, WE ACTUALLY HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING AT A PREVIOUS MEETING. SO THE PUBLIC HEARING AT LEAST COMING UP TO THE MIC PORTION HAS ENDED, BUT WE HAVE STILL ACCEPTED LETTERS, EMAILS FROM RESIDENTS. ALL CORRESPONDENCE THAT WE'VE RECEIVED HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING BOARD AND ADDED TO OUR PUBLIC COMMENT LETTER. WE'VE GOT SOME GUESTS. WE'VE GOTTEN SOME FOR. WHAT I WILL ADD FOR THIS PROJECT IS JUST TODAY I FORWARDED EVERYONE THE LWP COMMITTEE DID REVIEW THIS PROJECT. THEY DID APPROVE THEIR POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION. IT WAS IN A FIVE WORD EMAIL. SO I WILL ADD THAT TO THE RECORD AFTER THIS MEETING. BUT THEY DID APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION. 
          OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE RECOMMENDING BOARD FROM THE COMMITTEE. SO IT IS STILL UP TO THIS BOARD TO DECIDE WHETHER THIS ACTION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TOWN'S LW P, WHICH IS THE LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PLAN. AND THE OTHER PIECE THAT I'LL ADD IS WE DID GET SOME CORRESPONDENCE FROM SOME NEIGHBORS, AND I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO KIND OF CLEAR SOME THINGS UP BEFORE TURNING IT OVER TO THE APPLICANT AND HAVING THE BOARD SPEAK. THERE WAS A LETTER THAT WE GOT FROM A RESIDENT ASKING IF THE BOARD WAS CONSIDERING THIS PROJECT UNDER THE LAKEVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN THE LAKEVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT, WHICH DOES HAVE SPECIFIC SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BECAUSE OF THE PROPERTY'S WEIRD BOUNDARY PORTION OF IT IS IN THE ROUTE FIVE DISTRICT. THE ONE THAT FRONTS ONTO LAKESHORE ROAD AND THE ROUTE FIVE OVERLAY DISTRICT. THAT IS MORE OF AN OVERLAY THAT TALKS ABOUT ESTHETICS. IT DOESN'T REALLY HAVE SPECIFIC SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. SO I JUST WANT TO SPECIFY THAT THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN THE LAKEVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICT. A PORTION OF IT IS IN THE ROUTE FIVE OVERLAY. I'LL MENTION AGAIN THAT IN TERMS OF ZONING, BECAUSE THAT'S BEEN A BIG QUESTION. THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS R1. R1 ONLY ALLOWS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, CLUSTER HOUSING IF THE BOARD APPROVES OF IT. BUT APARTMENTS, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, RETAIL STRIP PLAZAS, DISPENSARIES, CAR WASHES, YOU NAME IT. MOST OF THAT IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE ZONING. AND THEN THERE WAS SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT STORMWATER DRAINAGE IN TERMS OF GRADING UTILITIES, THIS IS A UNIQUE KIND OF PROJECT WHERE THE ACTION THAT'S BEFORE THE BOARD IS TAKING THIS OVERALL PARCEL AND DECIDING WHETHER IT HAS MERIT TO SPLIT IT INTO FOUR BUILDABLE LOTS. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THAT TWO OF THEM WILL CONTAIN SOME EXISTING STRUCTURES. THERE WILL BE TWO THAT WILL BE VACANT THAT WILL HAVE FRONTAGE ONTO LAKESHORE ROAD. SO WHEN IT COMES TO WHETHER THE BOARD WILL CONSIDER DRAINAGE IMPACTS, WE DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT WILL COME FROM IT. THERE MAY BE DEVELOPMENT ON THOSE TWO LOTS. THERE MAY NOT. SOMEBODY MAY BUILD A HOME, SOMEBODY MAY NOT. SO IN TERMS OF UNDER SEEKER, WHEN REVIEWING UNDER SEEKER STORMWATER IMPACTS, GRADING IMPACTS, UTILITY IMPACTS, THOSE WILL COME IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO BUILD A HOME. AND AS YOU GUYS KNOW, THE PLANNING BOARD DOES NOT HAVE APPROVAL POWER OVER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SO SOMEBODY DEVELOPING ANY OF THOSE LOTS WOULD NOT EVEN COME TO THE PLANNING BOARD. THEY WOULD DEAL STRICTLY WITH THE TOWN ENGINEER AND CODE ENFORCEMENT. I ALSO WANTED TO QUICKLY ADDRESS THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT YOU GUYS WANTED ME TO REACH OUT TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ABOUT ACCESS ONTO ROUTE FIVE. I SENT TWO EMAILS TO THEM. THEY DIDN'T 
          [01:05:03]
RESPOND IN TERMS OF THAT PIECE OF THIS PROJECT. AS YOU GUYS KNOW, TYPICALLY DOT'S POLICY IS IF THERE IS ARTERIAL ACCESS OR SECONDARY ACCESS TO THEIR STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, THEY TYPICALLY TRY TO PUSH ACCESS, WHETHER IT'S A CURB CUT OR ANY TYPE OF NEW DRIVEWAY ONTO THAT SECONDARY ROAD. IN THIS CASE, THE TWO LOTS THAT WOULD BE HAVE FRONTAGE ON THE ROUTE FIVE DO NOT HAVE ANY SECONDARY ACCESS. SO I CANNOT TELL DOT WHAT TO DO, BUT I WOULD IMAGINE THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO GIVE ACCESS TO ANY TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT ON EITHER ONE OF THOSE ROADS, BECAUSE THERE WOULDN'T BE ACCESS FROM ANY ARTERIAL KIND OF SECONDARY ROAD. AND THEN THERE WAS ALSO A QUESTION ABOUT THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROPERTY. I DID RECEIVE A COPY OF THE SURVEY THAT WAS DONE BY PRESERVATION STUDIOS, THE THE TOWN COMMISSIONED 4261 IS MENTIONED IN THE SURVEY, BUT IT SUGGESTS THAT THE TOWN LOOK INTO IT FURTHER, DO FURTHER RESEARCH. IT DOESN'T HAVE A RECOMMENDATION THAT IT IS A NATIONAL OR STATE OR LOCAL DESIGNATED PROPERTY IF THE TOWN WANTED TO. THE TOWN HAS A PROCESS FOR DESIGNATING SOMETHING AS HISTORIC, LOCAL OR LOCALLY HISTORIC. BUT AT THIS TIME, THE SURVEY JUST TALKS ABOUT 426. 1ST MAY NEED FURTHER INVESTIGATION SO IT DOESN'T HAVE A SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION. 
          SO THAT WAS A LOT. BUT THOSE WERE ALL THE THINGS THAT I JUST WANTED TO CLEAR UP FOR THIS PROJECT, BECAUSE I KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ON THEM, AND I'LL KICK IT TO CHRIS TO KIND OF EXPLAIN ANYTHING FURTHER. OKAY. THANK YOU. WHAT YOU SAID ABOUT. THE ASSETS UNDER FIVE AND WHAT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO CONSULT WITH AN ALTERNATIVE. WELL, SURE. 
          SO I'M SORRY. REAL QUICK, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP CLOSER NOW THAT THERE'S SEATS THAT HAVE BEEN AVAILABLE THAT YOU CAN HEAR? I CAN SPEAK A LITTLE LOUDER TOO. SO WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT IS I REACHED OUT TO D.O.T. ON THIS PROJECT AND DOT DID NOT HAVE THEY DID NOT GIVE US ANY COMMENT BACK WHEN WE REACHED OUT. I WAS SAYING THAT DOT'S TYPICAL POLICY IS THAT FOR CURB CUTS OR ANY NEW DRIVEWAYS ONTO THEIR STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM, TYPICALLY IF THERE IS SECONDARY ACCESS. SO IF THERE'S ANOTHER ROAD OR AN ARTERIAL ROAD THAT WOULD PROVIDE ACCESS TO THAT SAME PROPERTY, TYPICALLY THEY WOULD WANT THAT TO BE USED AS THE ENTRANCE FOR ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT, IN THIS CASE, FOR THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. 
          SHOULD THESE TWO LOTS THAT WOULD HAVE FRONTAGE ONTO ROUTE FIVE BE SPLIT, THEY WOULD HAVE OBVIOUSLY ACCESS FROM ROUTE FIVE. THEY WOULDN'T HAVE ACCESS FROM ANY ARTERIAL OR SECONDARY ROAD. SO IF SOMEBODY WANTED TO BUILD A HOUSE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO WORK WITH DOT TO TRY TO GET ACCESS ONTO THEIR STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. AND I WAS EXPLAINING THAT TYPICALLY IN THAT PROCESS, THAT PERSON WHO WOULD WANT TO BUILD A HOME ON EITHER ONE OF THOSE LOTS, THEY WOULDN'T EVEN COME TO THE PLANNING BOARD. THEY WOULD HAVE TO DEAL WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT AND THE TOWN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BECAUSE THE PLANNING BOARD DOES NOT HAVE APPROVAL POWER OVER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. NO PROBLEM. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR HAVING US AGAIN. YEAH. 
          SO I PUT TOGETHER A LITTLE PRESENTATION, IF YOU DON'T MIND. I'M GOING TO GO STAND OVER THERE SO I CAN POINT TO THE SCREEN. IF THAT'S OKAY. THAT'S FINE. ALL RIGHT. AND I APOLOGIZE. I HAVE TO USE MY NOTES. I'VE BEEN VERY BUSY THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS. SO AS FAR AS THE LETTER THAT WAS PRESENTED THE LAST TIME AT THE MEETING, THIS LETTER WAS WRITTEN IN 2012. THAT WAS 14 YEARS AGO. AND THE PROCESS OF REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO GET HORSES ON THE PROPERTY. AT THE TIME, SHE WAS NOT CONSIDERING SUBDIVIDING. BUT AFTER 14 YEARS OF EVALUATION AND PLANNING, WE WERE ABLE TO COME UP WITH A PLAN THAT PRESERVES MOST OF THE PROPERTY CHARACTER. AS FAR AS OUR PREVIOUS TOWN APPEARANCES, 14 YEARS AGO, WE MADE A REQUEST, THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW HORSES, WHICH WAS ULTIMATELY GRANTED. AND TEN YEARS AGO WE PRESENTED TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR SPECIAL USE VARIANCE FOR A POTENTIAL BUYER TO RUN HER MEDICAL PRACTICE ON THE PROPERTY. ULTIMATELY, THIS VARIANCE WAS DENIED AND SHE INVESTED IN EAST AURORA INSTEAD. BUT THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO TIMES WE DEALT WITH THE TOWN, AND NOW WE'RE HERE TODAY. SO THIS IS IN BLACK AND WHITE WHAT WE'RE DOING. SO WE HAVE AN EXISTING HOME HERE, EXISTING HOME HERE. AND THESE WILL JUST BE A BUILDABLE LOT AND A BUILDABLE LOT. SO. AS FAR AS THE TUNNELS CONCERNED, IT'S IT'S ALWAYS BEEN A RUMOR. I REMEMBER IT WHEN I WAS A KID, BUT AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THIS DRAWINGS FROM THE 1950S, IT'S TOUGH TO MAKE OUT HERE, BUT ON THE ORIGINALS BEFORE THE SCAN, THERE'S A BOATHOUSE HERE AND THERE'S STAIRS HERE, AND IT'S LABELED AND EVERYTHING. SO BRINGS US TO THE CONCLUSION. NO TUNNEL WAS EVER THERE. IT MAY HAVE GOTTEN CONFUSED WITH THE TUNNEL FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD IN WANAKA, BUT AS FAR AS TUNNEL, THEY'RE NEVER THERE. AS FAR AS HISTORICAL. SO FOR SUBDIVIDING THE PROPERTY REALLY IN EFFECT, BECAUSE WE'RE JUST DRAWING 
          [01:10:09]
PROPERTY LINES IN A NUTSHELL, WE'RE NOT PLANNING ON REMOVING ANY BUILDINGS. SO THIS IS A BUILDING PERMIT FROM 1974. THIS IS WHAT THE HOUSE LOOKED LIKE BEFORE THE BUILDING PERMIT. 
          THIS IS WHAT THE HOUSE LOOKS LIKE NOW. ALL THESE ADDITIONS WERE DONE IN 1974. SO. HERE'S THE DATE, 1973 ON THE DRAWINGS. THIS WAS ALL ADD ONS. SO I BELIEVE ABOUT 300 ZERO SQUARE FOOT. AS FAR AS TRAFFIC, WE'RE ONLY PROPOSING THE POTENTIAL OF THREE ADDITIONAL HOUSEHOLDS. I THINK THREE ADDITIONAL HOUSEHOLDS ON A TRAFFIC ROUTE THAT HANDLES, I BELIEVE, 17,000 VEHICLES A DAY. DON'T QUOTE ME ON THAT ONE. THAT WAS OFF OF A.SITE, AND WE KNOW HOW DOT IS SO, BUT SO THREE HOUSEHOLDS WOULD REALLY HAVE A MINIMAL MINIMAL EFFECT. SO AS FAR AS LINE OF SIGHT CONCERNS OR DANGERS OF PULLING OUT ON LAKESHORE ROAD. SO THIS IS BEACH AVE, THIS IS THE ONE EVERYBODY THINKS ABOUT WHEN THEY THINK ABOUT PULLING OUT ON A ROUTE FIVE. SO ON THE OTHER END, 96 FOOT. SO I WOULDN'T PULL OUT ON A BEACH ROAD EITHER. 
          AS FAR AS OUR PROPOSED SUBDIVISION, YOU CAN SEE AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE ON THAT ONE. 
          THIS ONE, WHICH IS THE LESS OF IT, IS 400% FURTHER THAN I CAN SEE OUT OF BEACH ROAD. SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S NOT REALLY A COMPARISON AS FAR AS LINE OF SIGHT. THOSE ARE A COUPLE PICTURES OF IT. OH, WE MADE A LITTLE MOVIE FOR YOU, BUT I FORGOT TO BRING THE POPCORN WITH ME. SO. SO THIS WILL SHOW YOU OUR PROPERTY LINES, WHICH WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF MODIFYING. EVERYTHING SURROUNDED BY SIX FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE AND AND A BUNCH OF PLANTS. I GUESS YOU WOULD CALL IT SO GOOD. OH, I DID IT TEN TIMES SPEED BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO TAKE UP EVERYBODY'S TIME THIS EVENING. BUT YOU'RE ALWAYS WELCOME TO STOP BY TO. 
          SO WE'LL DO A WE'LL DO A QUICK ONE. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S GOING TO PLAY ON POWERPOINT, BUT WE'LL DO A QUICK. WE'LL PLAY ONE REAL QUICK. OKAY. DO YOU CARE WHICH ONE JUST WANTED INTRO. I DON'T CARE WHICH ONE. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH INTRO IS JUST ME BLABBING, YOU KNOW. 
          GOOD AFTERNOON, MEMBERS OF THE HAMBURG TOWN BOARD. WHAT I'M GOING TO DO IS I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU A VIDEO OF ALL THE BORDERS HERE AT LAKE CREST ESTATE. FIRST THING I'LL SHOW YOU IS THE ENTRANCE OFF DURHAM ROAD, WHICH OUR NEIGHBOR HAS ACCESS TO THEIR HOUSE THROUGH THE PROPERTY. AND THEN I WILL GO AROUND THE PROPERTY. THE FIRST SECTION WILL BE THE HOUSES THAT BORDER THE PROPERTY IN THE BACK WHICH THEIR HOUSES COME OUT ON ROUTE FIVE, AND I'LL GO ALONG ROUTE FIVE AND WE WILL COME UP THE BEACH ROAD SIDE AND THEN AROUND THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. SO ENJOY. YEAH, YEAH. ONE OTHER THING. I HAVE TO DO THIS ON THE TRACTOR. SO YOU. IN A NUTSHELL, THE ENTIRE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY A SIX FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH A BUNCH OF SHRUBS AND ALL THAT STUFF AROUND IT. AND IF SOMEBODY LIKES THEIR PRIVACY, THEY'RE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO WANT TO TAKE IT OUT. SO OKAY, SO THESE ARE JUST MORE PICTURES OF IT. AND THERE IS NOT ANY CURRENT PLANS TO CHANGE THAT. OH THIS IS OH, THAT'S ALL RIGHT. 
          [01:15:06]
SO YEAH. SO AS YOU SEE FROM THE VIDEO, THERE'S A FENCE AROUND THE ENTIRE PROPERTY HERE. THIS IS OUR NEIGHBOR'S DRIVEWAY, FENCE, FENCE, FENCE AND VEGETATION AROUND JUST ABOUT THE ENTIRE PROPERTY. SO, SO I KNOW PRIVACY CAME UP LAST TIME. AS FAR AS NOISE, IT'S ACTUALLY PROBABLY GOING TO REDUCE NOISE BECAUSE ON A LARGE ESTATE STUFF NEEDS TO BE DONE AT LEAST 12 HOURS A DAY. YOU HAVE BOBCATS RUNNING, LAWNMOWERS, RUNNING, ALL THAT STUFF. SO IF YOU SPLIT IT UP, THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE AS MUCH MAINTENANCE AT ONE TIME. ANYBODY WHO'S TO BUILD, THERE'S NOT MUCH MAINTENANCE IN THE NEW BUILD. SO. AS FAR AS TREES AND LANDSCAPING, WE DON'T HAVE ANY CURRENT PLANS TO REMOVE ANY OF THE LANDSCAPING AT THE MOMENT. I'M CONFIDENT SOMEONE HAS BUILD A NEW HOUSE ON THE TWO VACANT LOTS. I THINK THE LANDSCAPING WOULD BE BREATHTAKING. YOU KNOW, IT'S RIGHT ON THE WATER, SO I WOULD THINK THEY WOULD INVEST IN SOME LANDSCAPING. SO THIS IS JUST A FUN FACT. OUR SMALLEST LOT AT 0.67 ACRES, WHICH ALL THE REST ARE OBVIOUSLY BIGGER, WOULD STILL BE ALMOST DOUBLE THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE OF BEACH AVE PROPERTIES THAT BORDER FOUR TWO, SIX ONE LAKE SHORE ROAD AND TRIPLE THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE ON DURHAM ROAD OR STRATFORD TERRACE. SO AS FAR AS BENEFITS, HIGHER PROPERTY VALUES FOR SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, BETTER MAINTENANCE OF ALL STRUCTURES AND GROUNDS, INCREASED TAX REVENUE FOR THE TOWN OF HAMBURG, ADDITIONAL REVENUE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. PARCELS THAT ARE MORE CONSISTENT WITH R1 ZONING AND MORE FAMILIES CAN ENJOY THE PROPERTY AND THE LAKE VIEWS RIGHT HERE IN HAMBURG, NEW YORK. 
          AND I JUST WANT TO REITERATE AGAIN, THIS IS ALL WE'RE DOING SPLITTING AN EXISTING HOUSE FROM ANOTHER HOUSE AND TWO POTENTIAL BUILDING LOTS. OKEY DOKE. SO I WANT TO THANK EVERYBODY FOR THEIR TIME AND WE APPRECIATE IT. GREAT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. JOSH, WHAT IS OUR NEXT STEP. SO THIS BOARD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING A SECRET DECISION AND POTENTIALLY AN APPROVAL DECISION ON THIS FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION. WE'VE CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. YOU'VE HEARD THE RESPONSE FROM THE APPLICANT IN RESPONSE TO SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS. NOW IT'S TIME FOR BOARD DISCUSSION JUST ON THE PROJECT. ANY CONCERNS, ANY COMMENTS, ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION THAT YOU MAY WANT FROM THE APPLICANT. AND THEN FROM THERE, IF YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE, YOU CAN SUGGEST APPROVAL RESOLUTIONS. YOU CAN SUGGEST FURTHER DISCUSSION. YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT OPTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? SO BECAUSE THIS IS JUST A SUBDIVISION LAND, THERE'S NO ENGINEERING COMMENTS AT THIS TIME. BUT JUST FOR GENERAL NOTES ON THE HOW THE PROCESS WORKS HERE IN THE TOWN, WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL HOME IS CONSTRUCTED AND THEY COME IN FOR A BUILDING PERMIT, WE THEY ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THEIR LOT, WHICH THEN COMES TO ENGINEERING FOR REVIEW AT THAT TIME. SO WE LOOK AT WHERE THEIR ROOF LEADERS ARE CONNECTED. IF THEY HAVE A SUMP PUMP LINE, WE LOOK AT GRADING OF THE PROPERTY AROUND THE BUILDING AND GRADES OF THE BUILDING TO ENSURE THAT THERE'S NO DRAINAGE THAT IMPACTS NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. SO THAT ONLY OCCURS THOUGH ONCE A BUILDING PERMIT IS SUBMITTED. OKAY. UNDERSTOOD. SO THERE'S A PROCESS IN PLACE IN ORDER TO REVIEW AND ADDRESS ANY POTENTIAL STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE ISSUES. OKAY. BOARD MEMBERS, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? MEMBERS. JACK, I HAD A QUESTION. WHY? WHY TWO BUILDABLE LOTS? WHY? WHY NOT JUST ONE TWO ACRE LOT? BECAUSE IT'S PLENTY OF SPACE ON THERE, YOU KNOW, PLENTY OF SPACE. LIKE I SAID, IT'S IT'S ALMOST THREE TIMES THE AVERAGE BUILDING LOT IN THAT AREA. SO, YOU KNOW, WE'D LIKE TO HAVE ANOTHER BUILDING THERE. AND I THINK IT WOULD DO WELL FOR THE TOWN OF HAMBURG. IT'S A LAKE VIEW. SO WHATEVER'S GOING TO BE BUILT, THERE'S GOING TO BE A VERY BEAUTIFUL HOME. I MEAN, YOU KNOW, HOW DID HOW DID YOU COME TO THAT DETERMINATION TO HAVE TWO BUILDABLE LOTS INSTEAD OF JUST JUST PARCELING OFF THREE, YOU KNOW, SPLITTING THE PROPERTIES WITH THE HOUSES AND THEN JUST HAVING THE REST OF IT AS ONE LOT? I MEAN, YOU KNOW, YEAH, THAT'S, THAT'S THE PLAN WE CAME UP WITH. YOU KNOW, IT'S, I MEAN, IT'S A EIGHT AND A HALF ACRE PROPERTY. SO WE'RE JUST THAT THAT'S MORE THAN HALF OF AN ACRE. LIKE I SAID, IT'S THREE TIMES THE SIZE OF THE AVERAGE LOT IN THAT AREA. LIKE I SAID, IT'S THREE TIMES THE SIZE OF THE AVERAGE LOT IN THAT SPECIFIC AREA. SO WE DIDN'T SEE ANY PROBLEM WITH ADDING A THE FOURTH LOT. SO I MEAN, YOU, I'M 
          [01:20:10]
PROBABLY SOMEBODY'S GONNA END UP YELLING AT ME OR JOSH ABOUT USING THE MICROPHONE. CAN YOU SPEAK CLOSER TO THE MICROPHONE? I MEAN, DID YOU DO YOU SEE THAT IT'S WOULD BE EASIER TO MARKET TO LOT TWO SEPARATE LOTS OR I, I, I JUST YEAH, JUST NOT SEEING THE SO, YOU KNOW, A TWO ACRE LOT OR YEAH, WE'RE, WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO PUT THEM UP FOR SALE AT THE SAME TIME. SO POTENTIALLY SOMEBODY COULD BUY BOTH OF THEM IN A NUTSHELL, YOU KNOW, BUT IF THEY WANT ONE THEN THEY CAN BUY ONE. IF THEY WANT BOTH OF THEM, THEY CAN BUY BOTH OF THEM. IT MAY VERY WELL POTENTIALLY BE US. THAT PUTS HOUSE UP OVER THERE. SO. THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION. OKAY. 
          ANYBODY ELSE? NO, NO. ALL RIGHT. SO JOSH WILL GIVE YOU APPROVAL TO DRAFT APPROVAL RESOLUTION. 
          RIGHT. IT'S THE NEXT STEP. THE ONLY OTHER COMMENT THAT I WOULD LIKE TO ADD AS A POTENTIAL CONDITION IS FOR ANY OF THE NEIGHBORING LOTS TO MAINTAIN A MAINTAIN, I GUESS, WOULD IT BE THE EXISTING BUFFER? I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK OF A CONDITION WHERE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE NOTED HOW THE WHOLE AREA IS, YOU KNOW, SURROUNDED BY TREES AND HAS A BUFFER BETWEEN ANY OF THE NEIGHBORS, BUT ALLOWING THAT TO BE A CONDITION OR TO MAINTAIN SO THAT THE INTEGRITY OF WHAT PEOPLE ARE EXPERIENCING IN AND AROUND KIND OF STAYS AT THE STATUS QUO. BUT YET WE'RE NOT ALSO KIND OF PUTTING IN AN ISSUE THAT WILL MAKE IT UNBUILDABLE. SO DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT? I KNOW THAT WE'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, IN OTHER DIVISIONS WHERE IT'S, YOU KNOW, MAINTAIN SO MANY FOOT BUFFER IN CERTAIN AREAS WITH LIKE STREAMS COMING THROUGH AND SO FORTH. OKAY. YEAH. CONSERVATION EASEMENT. YEAH, I, I JUST, I JUST ATTORNEY JOSEPH GOGUEN, I JUST HEARD BILL CLARK SAY THE SAME THING THAT I WAS THINKING SOMETHING SIMILAR TO A CONSERVATION EASEMENT. SOMETHING WOULD HAVE TO RUN TO THE, WITH THE LAND. THE ONLY WAY YOU COULD RESTRICT IT IS IF IT WAS A CONDITION OF THE TRANSFER FROM THE PROPERTY, FROM THE CURRENT OWNER TO TO RUN WITH THE LAND SO THAT ANY NEW PERSON COMING TO DEVELOP THE LAND IS BOUND BY THOSE RESTRICTIONS TO HAVE LIKE A CONSERVATION EASEMENT. SO DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON THAT? I MEAN, IT'S MORE FOR THE MY THOUGHT IS FOR THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE ABUTTING, I GUESS I NEED TO LOOK AT MORE OF THE OVERALL, THE GOOGLE MAP VERSION. THEY'RE BIG ENOUGH THAT IF YOU SAID A TEN FOOT CONSERVATION EASEMENT, YOU'RE NOT IMPEDING. RIGHT. OKAY. SORRY. LIKE THEY'RE, THEY'RE BIG ENOUGH THAT IF YOU PUT A TEN FOOT CONSERVATION EASEMENT ALONG, ANYTHING THAT WAS ADJACENT TO OTHER PROPERTY, I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD IMPACT WHAT ANYBODY WAS GOING TO BUILD OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. SO CAN I INTERJECT ON THAT REAL QUICK? SO JUST FROM EXPERIENCE, FROM LIVING HERE, ALL THE STUFF THAT'S ON THE PROPERTY LINE IS VERY OLD, YOU KNOW, BUT IT'S WAY PAST ITS USEFUL LIFESPAN. 
          SO WE HAVE STUFF COME DOWN ALL THE TIME. SO, SO THEN DOES A CONSERVATION EASEMENT MAINTAIN WHAT'S EXISTING THERE OR THAT IT NEEDS TO BE PLANTED IN SUCH A WAY? YEAH. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS CAN PRETTY MUCH SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT THEM TO SAY ABOUT MAINTAINING THE PROPERTY, WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE PROPERTY, HOW IT GETS CARED FOR, EVERYTHING. 
          YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S BASICALLY A CONTRACT THAT RUNS WITH THE LAND ABOUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE, THAT BUFFER. OKAY. LIKE IF, IF TREES ARE TAKEN DOWN, THEY NEED TO BE REPLACED, ETC. AND IS THAT SOMETHING THAT THEN NEEDS TO BE SPELLED OUT IN THE CONDITION THAT WE WOULD THEN BE, AND THEN THERE WOULD BE AN A, AN EASEMENT THAT WOULD BE DONE THROUGH THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO BE PART OF ANY TRANSFER TO FOR THAT PARCEL. I'M GUESSING IT'S JUST THE ONE PARCEL THAT BUTTS UP TO THE THE BACKS OF THE PROPERTIES ON THAT OTHER. I'M TRYING TO GET THAT FIRST SIDE STREET. CAN YOU. SO FOR THE PROPERTIES ON THE SOUTHWEST SIDE OF BEACH AVENUE, THEIR BACKYARDS. IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO? YES. AND THEN WHAT IS THE PROPERTY THAT'S THEN SOUTH. NEXT TO THE. SO THE NEIGHBOR THAT'S THE FURTHEST SOUTH. YEAH. RIGHT. THAT'S THE TAIL. YOU CAN SEE THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF BUFFER THERE TO. RIGHT. 
          [01:25:17]
BUT THE IDEA IS TO NOT ABLE TO MAINTAIN THAT SORT OF BUFFERING THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS AND NOT HAVE TREE CLEARING THAT'S GOING TO GO AND THEN IMPACT HOW YOU KNOW THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA. 
          THAT'S MY GOAL IS TO BE ABLE TO TRY AND MAINTAIN SOME OF THAT BECAUSE OF THE CONCERNS WITH THE NEIGHBORS AND ALSO JUST THE INTEGRITY OF THE AREA. SO MAYBE WE COULD DISCUSS MORE ABOUT WHAT THAT CONDITION WOULD LOOK LIKE. AND IF IT NEEDS TO SPELL OUT BASED UPON EACH PROPERTY. 
          YEAH. WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL PUT I'LL WORDSMITH SOMETHING AND THEN I'LL BRING IT BACK AND YOU CAN TELL ME HOW TERRIBLE IT IS. OKAY. OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? NO, NO. ALL RIGHT. SO THEN NEXT STEPS WOULD BE TO. WE'LL SEE ON. CAN I ADD A LITTLE SIDE NOTE ON THAT. 
          YEAH. LIKE WE DO HAVE THE SIX FOOT FENCE THERE. AND LIKE I SAID, MOST OF THE STUFF IS IT'S WAY PAST ITS PRIME AND IT'S ALL THORNS AND IT REALLY DOESN'T REALLY LOOK THAT GOOD. IT'S AS FAR AS THE STUFF RIGHT UP ON THE FENCE LINE. SO I JUST WANT TO ADD THAT IN THERE. IT'S WELL, I BELIEVE A CONSERVATION EASEMENT CAN BE WRITTEN WHERE YOU CAN'T, YOU KNOW, BUILD A STRUCTURE OR ANYTHING, BUT YOU CAN ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE, SO ON AND SO FORTH WITHIN THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT. SO IT CAN BE WRITTEN WHERE IF THERE IS OLD THINGS THAT YOU WANT TO TAKE DOWN, THAT IT CAN BE WRITTEN THAT WAY. OKAY. BECAUSE I MEAN, WE HAVE TO TAKE STUFF OUT ALL THE TIME, RIGHT? SO IT'S NOT NECESSARILY TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING BAD STUFF. IT'S TO AVOID A MASS AMOUNT OF TREE CLEARING AND CREATING THE OPENNESS THAT IS, YOU KNOW, A CONCERN OF THE NEIGHBORS AND, YOU KNOW, THE CHARACTER OF, OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND SUCH. SO FAIR ENOUGH. THANK YOU. WE CAN WRITE IT THAT IF SOMETHING'S TAKEN OUT, IT'S GOTTA BE REPLACED SOMEHOW. RIGHT? BUT NOT, NOT NECESSARILY THE EXACT THING, RIGHT? THERE'S A THORN BUSH. YOU REPLACE THAT WITH A IT'S ALL BUSH, IT'S ALL THORN BUSHES. IT'S RIGHT. SO I THINK THEY USE A GREAT BUFFER, KEEPS EVERYONE AWAY. THORNS ON IT ARE PROBABLY THIS LONG. THEY'RE BRUTAL. RIGHT? YEAH. OKEY DOKE. SO THEN JOSH, ARE WE THEN SLATED TO SEE THEM BACK ON THE FIRST. THEY WERE EARMARKED. OKAY, GREAT. THEN WE'LL SEE YOU ON THE FIRST. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. CHRIS, YOU LEFT THIS ON THE TABLE HERE. OH THANK YOU. I'M ALWAYS GOOD. OKAY. SO JUST FOR FOR THOSE IN THE BACK WHO MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO HEAR, THIS PROJECT WAS TABLED TO THE JULY 1ST MEETING. SO IT'LL BE BACK ON JULY 1ST AND THEN WE'RE GOING UP. WHY DID WE. IT'S TABLED FOR THE BOARD TO CONSIDER CONDITIONS FOR POTENTIAL APPROVAL FOR JULY 1ST. OKAY. MOVING ON TO THE NEXT AND LAST ITEM ON THE 
          [8. Liza Acanfora – Requesting Site Plan Approval on a proposal for a childcare center to  be located at 4090 Jeffrey Blvd]
AGENDA. ECHO FAUNA REQUESTING SITE REQUESTING SKETCH PLAN DIRECTION ON A PROPOSAL FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 4090 JEFFREY BOULEVARD. HELLO. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS STEVE GELTZ, GELTZ FROM DARRELL MARTIN, ARCHITECT REPRESENTING THE OWNER FOR THE PROJECT. OKAY. 
          I'M SORRY, COULD YOU REPEAT YOUR NAME? STEVE GELTZ, GELTZ, YEAH. I'M SORRY. DO YOU GUYS MIND? WE'RE STILL CONDUCTING OUR BUSINESS. IF YOU COULD COME TO TAKE OUT TO THE BACK AREA. 
          RIGHT. SO THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. THAT IS NOT THE TYPE OF SETTING. PUBLIC HEARING WAS THE LAST MEETING, RIGHT? YES. AND ALSO THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. WE DID RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT. AND SO ALSO HAD RESPONDED TO THE COMMENTS THAT WERE PROVIDED. IF YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS ABOUT WHERE THE NEXT STEPS ARE, YOU CAN REACH OUT TO JOSH. WHY AREN'T THEY ABLE TO HEAR THAT? OKAY. MOVING ON. AND. JOSH TWO THIS IS ALSO FOR THE SPECIAL USE, CORRECT? FOR. YES. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO GOOD EVENING IN A NUTSHELL. PRETTY SIMPLE. OUR CLIENT IS LOOKING TO BUILD A DAYCARE IN THE BACK PORTION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT IS ALREADY ZONED WITH THE COMBINATION OF M1 AND M2 INDUSTRIAL ZONE, THE BACK PORTION OF THE BUILDING RIGHT NOW WILL BE CONVERTED OVER FOR THE DAYCARE. SO, YOU KNOW, FIRE SEPARATION BETWEEN AND THEN PART WITH THE DAYCARE IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY THAT LOOKING TO HAVE AN EXTERIOR PLAYGROUND AS PER TOWN REQUIREMENTS. WITH THAT, WE'LL 
          [01:30:06]
BE ABLE TO CREATE A SEPARATE ENTRANCE. TOWARDS THE BACKSIDE THAT'LL BE DEDICATED FOR THE PARENTS AND STAFF TO BE ABLE TO COME AND DROP OFF THE CHILDREN, BE ABLE TO PARK UP HERE IN THE FRONT AREA AND BE COMPLETELY SEPARATE FROM THE MAIN FACILITY. DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT SECURITY ISSUES AND EVERYTHING WITH THE THE CURRENT MANUFACTURING GOING ON INSIDE THE BUILDING, SO IT'LL BE ABLE TO STAY SEPARATE. IDENTITY. THESE ARE SOME OF THE RENDERINGS OF THE EQUIPMENT THAT WAS PROVIDED TO US JUST FOR THE CHILDREN OF FOR INFANTS AND OR NOT FOR NOT FOR INFANTS, BUT FOR TODDLERS AND FOR PRESCHOOL AGED CHILDREN. AND THEN FOR SOME OF THAT TOO, WITH THE AREA VARIANCE, WE'LL BE GOING BACK TO FOR ZBA FOR AN AREA VARIANCE, BUT BASICALLY IT'LL BE ABOUT 3000FT■S OF AN ENCLOSED PLAYGROUND AREA WITH A FENCE ONLY FOUR FEET HIGH, PROTECTING FROM THE CHILDREN FROM BEING OUTSIDE IN THE PARKING LOT. OTHER THAN THAT, THERE IS NO LANDSCAPING ENGINEERING. NOTHING ELSE REQUIRED, JUST SIMPLE MODIFICATION OF THROWING A PLAYGROUND WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AREA. OKAY. JOSH, IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD? YEAH. SO IF YOU GUYS RECALL, LIZA CAME A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO FOR A WORK SESSION AND GOT SOME GOOD INPUT. ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS PROJECT WILL NEED IS BECAUSE IT REQUIRES A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CHILDCARE CENTER. WE HAVE A VERY ANTIQUATED AND OUTDATED SPECIAL USE PERMIT SECTION FOR CHILD CARE CENTERS OR NURSERY SCHOOLS. SO SUBSECTION B TALKS ABOUT THE ADEQUATE OUTDOOR PLAY SPACE OR THE OUTDOOR SPACE. GREAT FEATURE. BUT UNFORTUNATELY IN OUR CODE YOU NEED 75 SWEET 75FT■S PER CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF THREE AND 100FT■S PER CHILD THREE YEARS OR OLDER. SO BECAUSE OF THAT, THIS PROJECT IS ALSO GOING TO NEED A VARIANCE. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT HAS ALREADY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR THEIR JULY MEETING. SO THIS BOARD OBVIOUSLY WILL BE SECRET LEAD AGENCY FOR FOR THAT PROJECT. BUT BECAUSE OF OUR SPECIAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS, THIS PROJECT WILL NEED A VARIANCE. ALL THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS IN THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS. I BELIEVE THAT THEY MEET. THEY DID MEET WITH ME, MYSELF AND CODE ENFORCEMENT TO KIND OF CHECK IN ON, YOU KNOW, THE STATUS OF THE THE ACTUAL PROJECT. AND THEY'RE HERE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT TO KIND OF GET SOME COMMENTS ON THEIR PROPOSAL. AND THEN WE CAN EVENTUALLY LET THEM GO TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, AND THEN THEY'LL RETURN FROM THEIR OKEY DOKE. AND JUST REAL QUICK, THE AMOUNT OF SPACE THAT IS STATED IN OUR TOWN CODE COMPARED TO WHAT NEW YORK STATE REGULATIONS ARE, WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED FOR THE VARIANCE MEETS ALL OF THE NEW YORK STATE REGULATIONS. CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. CAMI, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING? JUST A COUPLE ENGINEERING COMMENTS, JUST TO BE SURE THAT WE'RE EVERYONE'S I'M FOLLOWING WHAT'S GOING ON WITH THE PLAN. SO ENGINEERING HAS NO COMMENTS ON THE INTERIOR THAT'S HANDLED BY THE BUILDING PERMIT. SO FOCUSING ON THE EXTERIOR, THE ONLY THING THAT WAS NOTED WAS CHANGES TO THE SIDEWALK FOR HANDICAPPED RAMPS. YEP. AND IF I'M FOLLOWING CORRECTLY, NO CHANGES TO THE PARKING LOT OUTSIDE OF STRIPING. YEP. SO NO CHANGES TO THE GRADING, NO CHANGES TO DRAINAGE. 
          SO MY ONLY COMMENTS WOULD BE FOCUSED ON THE PLAYGROUND. WE'LL NEED TO KNOW THE SURFACE MATERIALS. AND IF THERE'S ANY DRAINAGE INVOLVED, DEPENDING ON HOW YOU'RE BUILDING IT ON THE EXISTING ASPHALT, REMOVING THE EXISTING ASPHALT, THAT KIND OF DETAIL. AND THEN THIS BOARD JUST MAY WANT TO CONSIDER THE FACT THAT IT IS ADJACENT TO A PARKING LOT, AND WHETHER OR NOT BOLLARDS OR SOME KIND OF PROTECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED. A FOUR FOOT CHAIN LINK FENCE WILL NOT STOP SUCH VEHICLES SHOULD THEY ACCIDENTALLY HIT THE GAS INSTEAD OF REVERSE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY CONCERN IS THAT KEEPING THAT LINE THAT IS ADJACENT TO THE PARKING LOT SAFE, THAT WOULD BE IT. GREAT. THANK YOU, BOARD MEMBERS, ANYTHING TO ADD? CHAD? ABOUT MINE? NO THANKS. TAMMY. OKIE DOKE. SO WE HAVE NO MORE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN DIRECTION, EXCEPT FOR PROVIDING SOME ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE MEASURE AROUND THE FENCING THAT ABUTS AGAINST THE PARKING. SO BOLLARDS, THAT SORT OF WAY IN WHICH WE CAN PROTECT FROM, LIKE YOU SAID, A CAR COMING THROUGH BY ACCIDENT. SO I GUESS WE'RE TABLED UNTIL YOU GUYS COME BACK FROM ZBA, IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. 
          SO UNLESS THIS BOARD WANTS TO YOU COULD DO A COORDINATED REVIEW. REALLY AREN'T MANY. I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY OTHER AGENCIES THAT WOULD HAVE ANY APPROVAL POWER OTHER THAN TOWN OF HAMBURG. BUT YOU COULD DO A COORDINATOR REVIEW IF YOU WANT OR IF NOT, THEY CAN GO TO THE 
          [01:35:01]
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, APPEAR BEFORE THEM, AND THEN THEY'LL BE BACK BEFORE THIS BOARD SOMETIME IN JULY. OKAY. I DON'T BELIEVE WE NEED TO COMPLETE A COORDINATED REVIEW. ANYBODY HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THAT? NO, I DON'T THINK SO EITHER. I MEAN, THAT OFFICE PARK, WE'VE GOT TONS OF STUDIES AND TRAFFIC THINGS. WE HAVE MORE THAN WHAT WE'D NEED FOR THIS ALREADY. 
          THAT IS CORRECT. OKAY, GREAT. SO THEN GOOD LUCK AT THE ZBA AND WE'LL SEE YOU BACK IN JULY. 
          AND THAT WILL BE FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. WE WOULD. SO WE CAN RIGHT NOW. NOW, SOMETIMES WE DO THIS, SOMETIMES WE DON'T CONTINGENT ON WHETHER THEY GET THE VARIANCE OR NOT. SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SOME TIME IN JULY, OR WE CAN WAIT. SO IT REALLY DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. SO THE NEXT STEP FOR THE PLANNING BOARD WOULD BE HAVING A PUBLIC HEARING AT THE PLANNING BOARD LEVEL. THAT'S OBVIOUSLY CONTINGENT ON THEM GETTING THEIR AREA. SO WHEN IS THAT? WHEN IS THE ZBA MEETING? THE CBA MEETING IS JULY 7TH, WHICH IS A TUESDAY. AND THEN OUR NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING IS JULY 15TH. SO THEN I WOULD PROPOSE SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 15TH. AND THEN IF THEY DON'T GET THE VARIANCE, WE COULD JUST PULL THEM. RIGHT. 
          OKAY. EVERYBODY ELSE AGREE I AGREE OKAY, GREAT. YES. AND I MAY BE CRAZY HERE, BUT CAN I GIVE YOU APPROVAL TO DRAFT RESOLUTIONS? YES. THE BOARD FEELS COMFORTABLE. ANYBODY? YES. 
          YEP. OKAY, GREAT. ALL RIGHT, ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU EVERYBODY. WE'LL SEE YOU ON THE 15TH. 
          THANK YOU, THANK YOU. GOOD LUCK. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE LAST MOTION OR AM I MISSING ANYTHING? MINUTES. OH, MINUTES. THERE'S BEEN A LOT GOING ON, SO DON'T HAVE MINUTES FOR YOU THIS WEEK. OKAY. CHECK IN NEXT WEEK. FOR TODAY. THERE'S MINUTES IN THE MINUTES FOLDER FOR A MEETING. THIS MEETING, I THOUGHT. NO, IT'S THE LINK. IT'S THE LINK. IT'S JUST THE LINK TO THE PROJECT FOLDER. YES, JUST THE PROJECT FOLDER. THERE'S NO MINUTES FOR 528 OR 6 THREE. BRIDGET DID HER JOB. I GOTTA DO MINE, SO. OH, YEAH. THEY'RE DATED TODAY. OKAY, OKAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. SEE, I THOUGHT I WAS OKAY. MORE IMPORTANTLY, I HAVE ANYONE TO MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. MEMBER RYAN MAKES A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING IN A SECOND.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.